Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    2007 - "doesnt count. No help. That team didnt belong there. The east sucks."

    2015 - "doesnt count if they lose. No help. That team didnt belong there. The east sucks"



    So why (if cleveland stuns the world) should we count the title if they win?

    If theyre not good enough to be there. Then obviously if they won it wouldnt be the correct outcome. Teams get upset every once and a while. Its not impossible for the cavs to win. They have a slim chance if jr smith and shump are on fire like they were this series against the hawks.

    So it would take a fluke by average team mates to win... so why would a fluke be anything to brag about?

    If you wanna be able to brag when you win you have to be able to take the criticism when you lose

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Basically i'm saying ... be prepared for 2 for 6 criticism if you lose. Cause we all know yall will put lebron #1 all time somehow if he wins

  3. #3
    NBA All-star lilteapot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,149

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    OP is the same retard who will say the 2012 and 2013 championships were asterisks, thus violating his own logic.

    OP's mother was a useless whore and her virgin son will end up the same way

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Quote Originally Posted by lilteapot
    OP is the same retard who will say the 2012 and 2013 championships were asterisks, thus violating his own logic.

    OP's mother was a useless whore and her virgin son will end up the same way

    If lebron didnt collude/win in a lockout year/have a team mate win the title for him. I'd give him 100% credit for those titles



    I give tons of players full credit for legit titles

    If i had to run through some...


    2014 - asterisk (duncan pay cut, same as ring chasing)
    2013 - asterisk (ray allen is the only guy deserving)
    2012 - asterisk (lockout)
    2011 - legit
    2010 - legit
    2009 - legit
    2008 - legit
    2007 - legit
    2006 - asterisk (rigged)
    2005 - legit
    2004 - legit
    2003 - legit
    2002 - legit ( kings outshot the lakers in ft's )
    2001 - legit
    2000 - legit
    1999 - asterisk (lockout)
    1998 - asterisk (push off)
    1997 - legit
    1996 - legit
    1995 - legit
    1994 - asterisk (jordan unable to play due to gambling ban)
    1993 - legit
    1992 - legit
    1991 - legit
    1990 - legit
    1989 - legit
    1988 - asterisk (isiah thomas was robbed in game 6. Shoulda won )

  5. #5
    YAY AREAAA!! Inferno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    6,950

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    How the **** is a lockout an asterisk? Thunder played just as many games as the Heat

  6. #6
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,685

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Ray Allen hitting 1 three makes it an asterisk? lol Lebron scored 16 points in the 4th quarter, and hit a three before Allen's three. But, you always ignore that shit.

  7. #7
    TX via OR KNOW1EDGE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    'murica
    Posts
    4,624

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    This is a really dumb thread.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Quote Originally Posted by Inferno
    How the **** is a lockout an asterisk? Thunder played just as many games as the Heat

    In comparison between teams from that same year.. there is no asterisk between what the 2012 thunder did and the heat...

    But when comparing them to teams from completely different years that had to go through a factual legit season... it isnt comparable


    I'd put lebrons 2012 title over duncans 1999 title. Thats about it... only cause 66 games > 50 games


    The less you play the less its worth. Its like a G.E.D diploma

    Are they as good as a full highschool diploma? No... just because its as good as the other kids that did the same course. It doesnt compare to people who had to do a full 4 years of highschool

  9. #9
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,475

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
    2014 - asterisk (duncan pay cut, same as ring chasing)
    This one's new.



    Duncan was an old man and took a pay cut for THIAGO ****ing SPLITTER. Not the same as joining a bunch of super friends in your prime.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won

    Quote Originally Posted by edrick
    Ray Allen hitting 1 three makes it an asterisk? lol Lebron scored 16 points in the 4th quarter, and hit a three before Allen's three. But, you always ignore that shit.

    Lol @ refering to the biggest make or break shot in nba history as "just one three"


    It was the one three between going home or not. If he misses the heat lose. Lebron loses. Its over. No title. Period


    Thats ray allens title and his alone.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •