-
if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
2007 - "doesnt count. No help. That team didnt belong there. The east sucks."
2015 - "doesnt count if they lose. No help. That team didnt belong there. The east sucks"
So why (if cleveland stuns the world) should we count the title if they win?
If theyre not good enough to be there. Then obviously if they won it wouldnt be the correct outcome. Teams get upset every once and a while. Its not impossible for the cavs to win. They have a slim chance if jr smith and shump are on fire like they were this series against the hawks.
So it would take a fluke by average team mates to win... so why would a fluke be anything to brag about?
If you wanna be able to brag when you win you have to be able to take the criticism when you lose
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Basically i'm saying ... be prepared for 2 for 6 criticism if you lose. Cause we all know yall will put lebron #1 all time somehow if he wins
-
NBA All-star
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
OP is the same retard who will say the 2012 and 2013 championships were asterisks, thus violating his own logic.
OP's mother was a useless whore and her virgin son will end up the same way
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Originally Posted by lilteapot
OP is the same retard who will say the 2012 and 2013 championships were asterisks, thus violating his own logic.
OP's mother was a useless whore and her virgin son will end up the same way
If lebron didnt collude/win in a lockout year/have a team mate win the title for him. I'd give him 100% credit for those titles
I give tons of players full credit for legit titles
If i had to run through some...
2014 - asterisk (duncan pay cut, same as ring chasing)
2013 - asterisk (ray allen is the only guy deserving)
2012 - asterisk (lockout)
2011 - legit
2010 - legit
2009 - legit
2008 - legit
2007 - legit
2006 - asterisk (rigged)
2005 - legit
2004 - legit
2003 - legit
2002 - legit ( kings outshot the lakers in ft's )
2001 - legit
2000 - legit
1999 - asterisk (lockout)
1998 - asterisk (push off)
1997 - legit
1996 - legit
1995 - legit
1994 - asterisk (jordan unable to play due to gambling ban)
1993 - legit
1992 - legit
1991 - legit
1990 - legit
1989 - legit
1988 - asterisk (isiah thomas was robbed in game 6. Shoulda won )
-
YAY AREAAA!!
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
How the **** is a lockout an asterisk? Thunder played just as many games as the Heat
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Ray Allen hitting 1 three makes it an asterisk? lol Lebron scored 16 points in the 4th quarter, and hit a three before Allen's three. But, you always ignore that shit.
-
TX via OR
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
This is a really dumb thread.
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Originally Posted by Inferno
How the **** is a lockout an asterisk? Thunder played just as many games as the Heat
In comparison between teams from that same year.. there is no asterisk between what the 2012 thunder did and the heat...
But when comparing them to teams from completely different years that had to go through a factual legit season... it isnt comparable
I'd put lebrons 2012 title over duncans 1999 title. Thats about it... only cause 66 games > 50 games
The less you play the less its worth. Its like a G.E.D diploma
Are they as good as a full highschool diploma? No... just because its as good as the other kids that did the same course. It doesnt compare to people who had to do a full 4 years of highschool
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
2014 - asterisk (duncan pay cut, same as ring chasing)
This one's new.
Duncan was an old man and took a pay cut for THIAGO ****ing SPLITTER. Not the same as joining a bunch of super friends in your prime.
-
Re: if we cant count when the cavs lose in the finals. why would we count it if they won
Originally Posted by edrick
Ray Allen hitting 1 three makes it an asterisk? lol Lebron scored 16 points in the 4th quarter, and hit a three before Allen's three. But, you always ignore that shit.
Lol @ refering to the biggest make or break shot in nba history as "just one three"
It was the one three between going home or not. If he misses the heat lose. Lebron loses. Its over. No title. Period
Thats ray allens title and his alone.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|