99 Robinson, 03 Duncan, 05 Ginobili, 07 Parker, 14 Leonard

[robert_shaww]

He is right. you can argue 99, but all in all im with him.

thanks. i knew it

[pastis]

what i dont understand is this: for duncan stans, duncan is the real mvp in 07, but ginobili in 05 or robinson in 99 of course didnt have a shot for the mvp. i just dont understand.

[T_L_P]

what i dont understand is this: for duncan stans, duncan is the real mvp in 07, but ginobili in 05 or robinson in 99 of course didnt have a shot for the mvp. i just dont understand.

Manu has a very real shot for 05, I just personally wouldn't pick him.

But if you look past who won the award, 07 very clearly becomes Duncan, as does 99.

He averaged like 5 more points, 2 more rebounds, 1 more assists, and 1 more steal/block than D. Rob, and I think he had better shooting numbers. Duncan also had a much better statline than Parker too, and he was still the anchor of the offense and the defense.

Just compare their numbers that year. Duncan averaged like 22/12/3/3 on very good shooting numbers, whilst Parker averaged 20/3/5/1 on mediocre shooting...and the disparity on defense shouldn't even need mentioning.

You Duncan haters, however, just spew random conjecture without any real argument. I asked the idiotic OP about 99 and 07 and he brought up 14...what else needs to be said?

[TheReal Kendall]