-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Prime HOFers when Nash won MVP: KG, Duncan, Kobe, Pierce, Allen, Wade, Nowitzki
Prime HOFers when Curry won his: Durant*
*Injured
Curry stays fraudulent
-
The Chosen King
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Durant, Griffin, Harden, Kyrie, maybe Davis.
-
Please clap.
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
How is Nash more impressive as a player? And how are guys like Pierce and Allen worth mentioning While James, Westbrook, etc are not?
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
How is Nash more impressive as a player? And how are guys like Pierce and Allen worth mentioning While James, Westbrook, etc are not?
LeBron declined this year
Westbrook would have won MVP if they made the playoffs, absolute monster. Pierce and Allen are two all time greats, Allen is basically Curry off the ball without the team Carry'd has around him now
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by the_troof
LeBron declined this year
Westbrook would have won MVP if they made the playoffs, absolute monster. Pierce and Allen are two all time greats, Allen is basically Curry off the ball without the team Carry'd has around him now
Complete bullshit. Players like Kobe in '06 and Wade in '09 had monster seasons and made the playoffs and didn't win MVP. It's always going to be the best player on one of the 4-5 best teams in the league
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Don't forget Shaq, who had good MVP case in 05. Winning MVP over prime Kobe, Lebron and Duncan in 06 was impressive as well.
Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
Complete bullshit. Players like Kobe in '06 and Wade in '09 had monster seasons and made the playoffs and didn't win MVP. It's always going to be the best player on one of the 4-5 best teams in the league
For now. I believe it will shift from media voters back to players soon. MVP = Most Valuable Player. It's not Most valuable player on a contending team. A guy like 09 Wade or 06 Kobe had a far bigger impact on their teams than Curry this year. MVP to me should be handed to a player that is actually the best player in the world that year, regardless of how well his teammates perform or what kind of a coach he has.
This is why MVPs don't matter much to me at all because we all know Shaq and Kobe deserved more MVPs if people hold that award to such a standard.
Last edited by ImKobe; 05-22-2015 at 02:51 PM.
-
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by ImKobe
Don't forget Shaq, who had good MVP case in 05. Winning MVP over prime Kobe, Lebron and Duncan in 06 was impressive as well.
For now. I believe it will shift from media voters back to players soon. MVP = Most Valuable Player. It's not Most valuable player on a contending team. A guy like 09 Wade or 06 Kobe had a far bigger impact on their teams than Curry this year. MVP to me should be handed to a player that is actually the best player in the world that year, regardless of how well his teammates perform or what kind of a coach he has.
This is why MVPs don't matter much to me at all because we all know Shaq and Kobe deserved more MVPs if people hold that award to such a standard.
What years should Shaq & Kobe have won MVP?
-
Please clap.
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by the_troof
LeBron declined this year
Westbrook would have won MVP if they made the playoffs, absolute monster. Pierce and Allen are two all time greats, Allen is basically Curry off the ball without the team Carry'd has around him now
And his "declined" stats are as good as Pierce and Allen have ever had. As a Cs fan I can tell you that Pierce was never seriously discussed as an MVP candidate and Allen wasn't either. And both guys led teams that missed the playoffs for one of Nash's two MVP years. The year they did make the playoffs and Nash won MVP Pierce's Cs were no better than Westbrook's Thunder, 45-37. And again, these guys weren't in the MVP hunt. Neither ever made first team All-NBA. So again, how are these guys mentioned but you ignore Westbrook and James? It doesn't make sense.
And we still haven't addressed how Nash is better than Curry.
-
2nd Greatest Player
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Idiotic Kobetards with a hidden agenda. I hope you slit your throat right now.
-
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Curry's MVP isn't fraudulent but I will take Nash over Curry all day.
OP is a bitch though, this thread is unnecessary.
-
tr
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by Lebron23
Idiotic Kobetards with a hidden agenda. I hope you slit your throat right now.
-
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
2015 Curry is better than any version of Nash.
-
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by ImKobe
This is why MVPs don't matter much to me at all because we all know Shaq and Kobe deserved more MVPs if people hold that award to such a standard.
This myth has been debunked several times already. Shaq missed too many games/came into seasons out of shape/was lazy/etc and thus didn't have impressive regular seasons those years of his prime he could of seriously contended for MVP.
-
The Chosen King
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by Lebron23
Idiotic Kobetards with a hidden agenda. I hope you slit your throat right now.
Are you insane?
-
Re: Steve Nash MVPs were much more impressive then currys
Originally Posted by Springsteen
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|