-
has a need for speed
Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
There's no doubting he's done a solid job and has had to deal with injuries to star players at bad times. But is he the right man to take this group of players to the Championship?
-
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
-
Curry fam
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Yes and no. The Thunder were a top 5 defense with neither Durant or Westbrook playing.
The Thunder are not changing changing coaches, Westbrook and Durant just need to play better if they want to win.
-
Shit just got cereal
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
solid job?
It took him how long to finally bench Perkins?
-
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Scott Brooks should go back to coaching high school girls basketball.
-
Greatest
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by Top Gun
There's no doubting he's done a solid job
What? He's the worst coach in the league. Perhaps debatable with McHale. No redeeming features to his coaching style.
A glorified cheerleader dressed in a suit.
-
Made that high school varsity squad
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Coming from a hardcore, studious Thunder fan who has essentially watched every game since the team moved to OKC...
There is a decent coach down inside Scott Brooks somewhere. It simply never shows itself when Russ or KD are playing.
If you watched every game of the Thunder's 3-12 start this year like I did, you would see that, inexplicably, the Thunder were running an offense. They had motion, passing, and a plan. Their defense was top-notch as well. It's as if Brooks realized that without KD and Russ, he really needed to do something. I commend Brooks for his coaching effort during that 3-12 stretch.
However, when Russ and/or KD are playing, all semblance of a quality coach completely disappears. He stands there and does nothing while KD and Russ run everything. I'll never understand what he says when he calls a timeout before a last-second play. It's always just KD or Russ taking their guy one-on-one. What is he drawing up??
-
The Beast In Me
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by navy
Yes and no. The Thunder were a top 5 defense with neither Durant or Westbrook playing.
The Thunder are not changing changing coaches, Westbrook and Durant just need to play better if they want to win.
This. Not to sound like a LeBron stan, but there are really no excuses.
They have two of the five best players in the world. Their role players are mostly solid. They just need to raise their games in the Playoffs, and start playing good defense (in the Playoffs). Every year they don't win is a huge blip, just like it was for both Shaq and Kobe in 03 and 04 (and in 03 their role players were a lot worse than OKC's).
-
sahelanthropus
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Scott Brooks is bitchmade. Awful rotations and offensive sets.
I do think he deserves some credit for OKC's defense though. They overachieve on that end pretty consistently each season.
-
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by navy
Yes and no. The Thunder were a top 5 defense with neither Durant or Westbrook playing.
The Thunder are not changing changing coaches, Westbrook and Durant just need to play better if they want to win.
They are a top 5 defense because everyone they draft has elite height, length, and athleticism for their position, and in many cases were elite defenders in college.
Roberson and Westbrook were both DPOY's in their college conferences, Adams is a solid defender for his age, Ibaka is a DPOY candidate every year, and Durant is a great defender who keeps getting better each year.
All Brooks does as a coach is basically say "go play." Pretty much everything he does aside from that actively makes the team worse.
Last edited by russwest0; 12-28-2014 at 06:32 PM.
-
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by T_L_P
This. Not to sound like a LeBron stan, but there are really no excuses.
They have two of the five best players in the world. Their role players are mostly solid. They just need to raise their games in the Playoffs, and start playing good defense (in the Playoffs). Every year they don't win is a huge blip, just like it was for both Shaq and Kobe in 03 and 04 (and in 03 their role players were a lot worse than OKC's).
they had injuries the last two post seasons
-
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by T_L_P
This. Not to sound like a LeBron stan, but there are really no excuses.
They have two of the five best players in the world. Their role players are mostly solid. They just need to raise their games in the Playoffs, and start playing good defense (in the Playoffs). Every year they don't win is a huge blip, just like it was for both Shaq and Kobe in 03 and 04 (and in 03 their role players were a lot worse than OKC's).
They would have won in 2013 without the Westbrook injury.
2014 was inexcusable and mainly a loss due to horrid coaching. OKC's management really dropped the ball by not firing Brooks last offseason. That alone might be the decision that has Durant on his way out in two offseasons.
-
Dunking on everybody in the park
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Some coaches are ideal for young players by building a family type environment, helping to build up young players, and can help transform teams from bad to elite. It made sense to keep things simple when their core group of players were 21 and 22 years old and it was better off to let their talent rule the day.
But there are some coaches that are simply unable to hold her superstars accountable and replacement as necessary. Scott Brooks looks hesitant to hold his superstars accountable and his main plan is so just simply let them ad-lib and be great, which works great in the regular season and against vastly inferior opponents.
I don't see Scott Brooks as able to lead this team to championship. But the players love him and this leaves the front office for Oklahoma City in quite a quandary.
-
Land o' Lakes
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
He's like Doc Rivers. He can manage team personalities, but can't do good rotations or X's and O's for shit. A poster already said that the current roster has very good defenders, so I can't really give him credit for that when there's no offense. OKC won't win the title this year barring god-like play from WB and KD in the playoffs if they make it.
-
Induuubitably
Re: Is Scott Brooks the right man to lead OKC to a Championship?
Originally Posted by Westbrook0
Coming from a hardcore, studious Thunder fan who has essentially watched every game since the team moved to OKC...
There is a decent coach down inside Scott Brooks somewhere. It simply never shows itself when Russ or KD are playing.
If you watched every game of the Thunder's 3-12 start this year like I did, you would see that, inexplicably, the Thunder were running an offense. They had motion, passing, and a plan. Their defense was top-notch as well. It's as if Brooks realized that without KD and Russ, he really needed to do something. I commend Brooks for his coaching effort during that 3-12 stretch.
However, when Russ and/or KD are playing, all semblance of a quality coach completely disappears. He stands there and does nothing while KD and Russ run everything. I'll never understand what he says when he calls a timeout before a last-second play. It's always just KD or Russ taking their guy one-on-one. What is he drawing up??
Do you believe that his stars do as they please (shoot at will, excessive iso ball) because of his flawed coaching strategies or do they just tune him out because they can?
I guess the cause and effect all boil down to slack coaching anyway. I totally agree with you on this btw...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|