Westbrook's career per-36 stats are eye popping

[PejaTheSerbSnip]

Heck they're not that far off LeBrons....raw stats at least

22.2 5.5 (1.7 ORB) 7.5

25.0 6.5 (1.0 ORB) 6.3

now don't get me wrong, hes not really in LeBrons class as a player, doesn't shoot as efficienctly and isn't as good defensively....but damn that's surprising. Really fills up the stat sheet.

[J Shuttlesworth]

According to Mike and Mike, here are his stats the last 6 games

Shooting 41%, under 50% in every game
26% on threes
Effective FG% 43.7%, would rank sixth worst in NBA
Averaging 5 1/2 turnovers
OKC with Westbrook on floor -24, Westbrook off floor +36
Thunder are 1-3 against teams with winning records

[navy]

Westbrooks raw stats are higher than Lebrons, what do you mean not far off?

[navy]

According to Mike and Mike, here are his stats the last 6 games

Shooting 41%, under 50% in every game
26% on threes
Effective FG% 43.7%, would rank sixth worst in NBA
Averaging 5 1/2 turnovers
OKC with Westbrook on floor -24, Westbrook off floor +36
Thunder are 1-3 against teams with winning records

Outside of that Clippers game, wtf?

[warriorfan]

According to Mike and Mike, here are his stats the last 6 games

Shooting 41%, under 50% in every game
26% on threes
Effective FG% 43.7%, would rank sixth worst in NBA
Averaging 5 1/2 turnovers
OKC with Westbrook on floor -24, Westbrook off floor +36
Thunder are 1-3 against teams with winning records

I've been saying these things for a long time now and Westbrook stans would just flip out and say I'm trolling. Go check Westbrooks game log, always feasts off terrible teams and when he gets his vs a good team they lose.

[PejaTheSerbSnip]

Westbrooks raw stats are higher than Lebrons, what do you mean not far off?

2.9 less points, 1.0 less rebounds, 0.4 less blocks, and 0.7 more turnovers....buuut 1.2 more assists.

So just a little off. But that's just raw stats. Obviously LeBron is way more efficient, a better defender, and the fact that he was able to PLAY more minutes is a credit to him.

All I'm saying is Russ is putting up some gaudy stats.

[J Shuttlesworth]

I've been saying these things for a long time now and Westbrook stans would just flip out and say I'm trolling. Go check Westbrooks game log, always feasts off terrible teams and when he gets his vs a good team they lose.

There's no doubt that his stretch is overrated.

I'm sorry but 44% usage rate... It's just absolutely unacceptable unless you're scoring the ball efficiently. Their wins have been against the sixers (barely), the raptors (struggling) and the T-wolves. Those stats that Mike and Mike put up were before the Minnesota game, iirc

[Jacks3]

^yeah, except westbrook has a 58% TS since the beginning of feb, so he's been plenty efficient. the thunder have a +3.5 offense in that stretch, which would rank in the top five in the entire league. and they've gone like 13-5 since his run started. so yeah. you're wrong. there's nothing overrated about what he's doing. this is historic stuff.

[navy]

2.9 less points, 1.0 less rebounds, 0.4 less blocks, and 0.7 more turnovers....buuut 1.2 more assists.

So just a little off. But that's just raw stats. Obviously LeBron is way more efficient, a better defender, and the fact that he was able to PLAY more minutes is a credit to him.

All I'm saying is Russ is putting up some gaudy stats.

I think you have the wrong stats sheet cause I have no idea how you are getting Lebron's raw stats being higher than Westbrooks.

[J Shuttlesworth]

^yeah, except westbrook has a 58% TS since the beginning of feb, so he's been plenty efficient. the thunder have a +3.5 offense in that stretch, which would rank in the top five in the entire league. and they've gone like 13-5 since his run started. so yeah. you're wrong. there's nothing overrated about what he's doing. this is historic stuff.

His February is absurdly good.

But his streak of triple doubles (what was it 6 in 7 games?) is overrated.

[Graviton]

His February is absurdly good.

But his streak of triple doubles (what was it 6 in 7 games?) is overrated.

Only overrated if you watch ESPN or even care about their dicksucking. Nobody gives a shit about those triple doubles on these forums, especially when they come in losses.

[J Shuttlesworth]

Only overrated if you watch ESPN or even care about their dicksucking. Nobody gives a shit about those triple doubles on these forums, especially when they come in losses.

Considering there were a bunch of "Westbrook with another triple double" threads during the L's, I would disagree with you

[Graviton]

Considering there were a bunch of "Westbrook with another triple double" threads during the L's, I would disagree with you

Link those "bunch", it's only Jerryseinfield.

[PejaTheSerbSnip]

I think you have the wrong stats sheet cause I have no idea how you are getting Lebron's raw stats being higher than Westbrooks.

Career per 36 minutes raw stats

[navy]

Career per 36 minutes raw stats

Oh. Well, that makes sense. I was looking at 2015 and was confused.