- Forum
- InsideHoops Main Basketball Forums
- NBA Forum
- 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
-
0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Player A: A Player who never had over a 50% success rate in the Finals
Player B: A Player who never had below a 60% success rate in the Finals.
-
Big Booty Hoes!!
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Originally Posted by WeGetRing2012
Player A: A Player who never had over a 50% success rate in the Finals
Player B: A Player who never had below a 60% success rate in the Finals.
Whichever player is better.
-
Laker Nation
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
-
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
I'll take Wilt over Derek Fisher.
Last edited by RoundMoundOfReb; 06-18-2014 at 04:53 PM.
-
The Fam
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
-
Red Nation
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Neither cause I don't know which player is better.
Its like asking if Derek Fisher is better than Tracy McGrady
A dude with a bunch of playoff success vs A guy who's only made it out of the 1st round once.
-
Big Booty Hoes!!
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Durant is 0%.
Tony Parker is 80%. 4 rings and a FMVP.
You tell me who's better.
-
Greatest
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Do people even give a shit about context anymore or what?
-
Big Booty Hoes!!
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Originally Posted by K Xerxes
Do people even give a shit about context anymore or what?
Context only applies when it suits your own agenda.
-
3/8 is real
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Originally Posted by WeGetRing2012
Player A: A Player who never had over a 50% success rate in the Finals
Player B: A Player who never had below a 60% success rate in the Finals.
No one cares about players who did not have a 100% success rate in the finals with at least 3 finals appearances under their belt unless they were not around to witness it first hand, thus having to resort to players who lack perfection like player A and B in your example.
-
High School Starter
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Originally Posted by NumberSix
Durant is 0%.
Tony Parker is 80%. 4 rings and a FMVP.
You tell me who's better.
Damn
-
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
Originally Posted by Smook A.
Neither cause I don't know which player is better.
Its like asking if Derek Fisher is better than Tracy McGrady
A dude with a bunch of playoff success vs A guy who's only made it out of the 1st round once.
Derek Fisher please. Give me a player who is good with their role & succeeds. Not one who can't deliver what's expected of him.
-
Good High School Starter
Re: 0%, 0%, 33%, 50%, 40% vs. 100%, 100%, 100%, 75%, 60%, 66%, 71%
The one who has more rings.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|