Would Lebron be the greatest ever if he wins this year?

[Lebronxrings]

By winning he would beat: a 73 wins warrior team
67 win spurs
55 win thunder (more like a 65+ win)
56 win raptors

would he surpass Jordan? I never seen Jordan beat these teams.

[LAZERUSS]

By winning he would beat: a 73 wins warrior team
67 win spurs
55 win thunder (more like a 65+ win)
56 win raptors

would he surpass Jordan? I never seen Jordan beat these teams.

His team will not have beaten all three of those Western Conference teams. Nor would they if they were in the West.

[Lebronxrings]

His team will not have beaten all three of those Western Conference teams. Nor would they if they were in the West.

Im assuming he wins the championship in this case.

[L8krH8tr]

jordan will not be passed, try harder.

[LAZERUSS]

Im assuming he wins the championship in this case.

Still, I admit if they face, and beat the Warriors...yes, a huge addition to Lebron's resume.

Beating the Thunder...not as much.

But then again...three rings is an impressive team feat.

[NBAGOAT]

not even close. Not top 3 either but I could see top 5.

[ScalsFan21]

If the 73-win Warriors make the Finals and the Cavaliers beat them it will likely be the single most impressive feat in Finals history by LeBron right there. It would be something that no other ATG has done, given the gaps in supporting cast as well as the fact that Curry is coming off a one-of-a-kind UMVP. Just imagine the meltdowns.

It wouldn't hold a candle to how impressive it would be if this OKC can go through Spurs/Warriors/Cavs all in a row, but since they're about to get cut short in 7 by Golden State, anyone who wants to see an upset is going to have to settle for the Cavs winning in 6, closing the Dubs out at the Q.

[Lebronxrings]

Still, I admit if they face, and beat the Warriors...yes, a huge addition to Lebron's resume.

Beating the Thunder...not as much.

But then again...three rings is an impressive team feat.

beating the best in the west should count as beating all those teams. If the cavs beat the thunder it basically tells us they would beat the warriors and spurs.

[LAZERUSS]

BTW, if the Thunder go on and beat the Warriors, then the Cavs in the Finals...that would arguably the GOAT run by a team in NBA post-season history.

Especially since the last three series would all have been without HCA.

[ScalsFan21]

BTW, if the Thunder go on and beat the Warriors, then the Cavs in the Finals...that would arguably the GOAT run by a team in NBA post-season history.

Especially since the last three series would all have been without HCA.

No doubt about it.

[KiiiiNG]

If the 73-win Warriors make the Finals and the Cavaliers beat them it will likely be the single most impressive feat in Finals history by LeBron right there. It would be something that no other ATG has done, given the gaps in supporting cast as well as the fact that Curry is coming off a one-of-a-kind UMVP. Just imagine the meltdowns.

It wouldn't hold a candle to how impressive it would be if this OKC can go through Spurs/Warriors/Cavs all in a row, but since they're about to get cut short in 7 by Golden State, anyone who wants to see an upset is going to have to settle for the Cavs winning in 6, closing the Dubs out at the Q.

[ScalsFan21]

We'll see tho. We'll see.

[CelticBaller]

No

[Leroy Jetson]

beating the best in the west should count as beating all those teams. If the cavs beat the thunder it basically tells us they would beat the warriors and spurs.

That's ridiculous, the Cavs only beat the sorry Eastern teams, it's not like the highlander where you collect all the power of the teams your opponent has already beaten.

[imdaman99]

If the Cavs were in the West and had to be aligned to play the Spurs and than the Warriors, how many games would it take to beat them both?

I say they sweep the Spurs and than sweep the Warriors

[color=white]/s bronstans[/color]