-
Gif-ted
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
They ran into GS, simple as that.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Aside from the goat pg/goat center combo of magic/kareem, high apg players don't win championships
Period
Since the 3-point line began 30 years ago, only Magic won a ring averaging 10 apg, and only 4 other guys won rings averaging over 8 apg
People have this idea that someone getting 10 apg is such a great thing, but it usually means the ball-handler held the ball most of the possession and then found someone open to finish the play - their ball-dominance replaced ball movement and it's hard to win that way
Otoh, the way nearly all championships are won is by having a timely scorer that gets 4-7 apg (11' Dirk, 06' Wade, Kobe, MJ, KD, Kawhi, Duncan, etc) - being able to find teammates is important, but in the flow of the game and with ball movement (unpredictable), not 1 guy pounding the rock and then finding someone (predictable)
-
Made that high school varsity squad
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
-
... on a leash
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
because better players have led better teams?
OP is really really bad at this basketball thing
-
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Chris Paul has never been on the best team in the league.
-
RIP P
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by 3ball
Aside from the goat pg/goat center combo of magic/kareem, high apg players don't win championships
Period
Since the 3-point line began 30 years ago, only Magic won a ring averaging 10 apg, and only 4 other guys won rings averaging over 8 apg
People have this idea that someone getting 10 apg is such a great thing, but it usually means the ball-handler held the ball most of the possession and then found someone open to finish the play - their ball-dominance replaced ball movement and it's hard to win that way
Otoh, the way nearly all championships are won is by having a timely scorer that gets 4-7 apg (11' Dirk, 06' Wade, Kobe, MJ, KD, Kawhi, Duncan, etc) - being able to find teammates is important, but in the flow of the game and with ball movement (unpredictable), not 1 guy pounding the rock and then finding someone (predictable)
Kyle Lowry just won a championship averaging ~9 APG.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by 3ball
Aside from the goat pg/goat center combo of magic/kareem, high apg players don't win championships
Period
Since the 3-point line began 30 years ago, only Magic won a ring averaging 10 apg, and only 4 other guys won rings averaging over 8 apg
People have this idea that someone getting 10 apg is such a great thing, but it usually means the ball-handler held the ball most of the possession and then found someone open to finish the play - their ball-dominance replaced ball movement and it's hard to win that way
Otoh, the way nearly all championships are won is by having a timely scorer that gets 4-7 apg (11' Dirk, 06' Wade, Kobe, MJ, KD, Kawhi, Duncan, etc) - being able to find teammates is important, but in the flow of the game and with ball movement (unpredictable), not 1 guy pounding the rock and then finding someone (predictable)
paul was a low key ball dominator, iso mismatch spammer.
He did almost everything right, but is best suited as a number 2... the guys like 5'10 though pretty much maxed out what he could do. He couldnt be a superstar playing like kobe or jordan... that wouldve made him brandon jennings.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by Young X
Kyle Lowry just won a championship averaging ~9 APG.
he averaged 6.5 apg in the playoffs.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater
because better players have led better teams?
This...pretty simple.
Paul was great, but he's not a championship first option.
Not really a knock...hardly anyone in history truly is.
-
RIP P
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Isiah Thomas averaged over 8 APG in the 1989 and 1990 playoffs.
Rondo averaged over 9 APG in the 2010 playoffs (no they didn't win game 7 but they were one possession away).
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by DMAVS41
This...pretty simple.
Paul was great, but he's not a championship first option.
Not really a knock...hardly anyone in history truly is.
and probably like one in a billion at his height and wingspan.
-
Lol
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by DMAVS41
This...pretty simple.
Paul was great, but he's not a championship first option.
Not really a knock...hardly anyone in history truly is.
You
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
-
RIP P
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by DMAVS41
I don't consider Rip or Billups as a championship first option because they weren't. Neither was the clear cut best player on a title winning team.
And, no, I don't think Paul deserves to be considered that when he never did it...and broke down in deep runs and or he and his teams fell apart in the biggest moments.
Not sure what is "crazy" when we just watched it all happen.
Just because he never did it doesn't mean he wasn't good enough.
At his peak in 2008 and 2009 he was good enough to do it.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Chris Paul is a great two-way player and extremely skilled, so why does he not win?
Originally Posted by Young X
Just because he never did it doesn't mean he wasn't good enough.
At his epak in 2008 and 2009 he was good enough to do it.
I agree that doesn't mean he wasn't good enough...nothing is certain.
But I'm not giving him credit for something he didn't do...and when he did have his chances...he either broke down or he and his teams completely shit the bed.
Is what it is...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|