-
Very good NBA starter
Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
From 2004 to 2011 Wade has Been a Better Player than Kobe
Career Season
[COLOR="DarkRed"]Wade: 25.4 PPG/48.5% FG/5.1 RPG/6.3 APG/1.8 SPG/1.1 BPG/ 3.6 TOVs PG/2.6 PFsPG/PER: 25.7/DRT 104[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Sienna"]Kobe: 25.3 PPG/45.4% FG/4.1 RPG/4.7 APG/ 1.5 SPG/0.5 BPG/2.9 TOVs PG/2.6 PFs PG/PER: 23.5/DRT 105[/COLOR]
Career Play-Offs:
[COLOR="darkred"]Wade: 25.9 PPG/48.3% FG/5.7 RPG/ 5.6 APG/1.6 SPG/ 1.0 BPG/ 4.0 T0Vs PG/3.0 PFs PG/ PER: 24.6/ DRT 102[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Sienna"]Kobe: 25.4 PPG/44.8% FG/5.1 RPG/4.8 APG/1.4 SPG/0.7 BPG/3.0 TOVs PG/3.0 PFs PG/ PER: 22.3/ DRT 106[/COLOR]
Only Reason why Wade has more TOVs is because he has played with Weaker Casts than Kobe has
Head to Head: Wade Dominated the game All Around Wise
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...01&p2=wadedw01
Bryant is the Most Overrated Superstar of All Time....Right there with Bill Russell
Wade is More Impactfull, Efficient and All Around Wise Plus D > Bryant
Last edited by Round Mound; 10-28-2011 at 02:02 AM.
-
-
............
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Last edited by D-Wade316; 10-28-2011 at 02:02 AM.
-
College star
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
This has been said million of times, but i won't go into too much detail.
The likes of Lebron, Wade, Rose, etc..., had the green light on offense as soon as they entered the league. Put any of those on the Lakers with prime Shaq, the chances are none of them will have similar career numbers.
Sure, you might make the case that Kobe wasn't good enough to have the green light from the get go, but he would average at least 20PPG his first couple of seasons if he was given the situations those players were in.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Clutch stats?
Playoff record[remember east versus west]?
-
phal5
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
-
............
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Originally Posted by DevilsAssassin
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Now You Hate Stats? Now because they don`t favor your favorite player you will go against that evidence? OH Kobe scored 81 against the worst NBA team ever? Robinson scored 71 and nobody of the Real Fans say he was a better offensive player than Hakeem.
What about PER, EFF, Plus/Minus, Shot Made/Missed Diferential/WSares Per 48 Minutes etc mostly i repeat mostly all will favor Wade
Wade is a Better All Around Player and Defender tham Bryant. PER and DRT won`t Give You What Style of Player You Like but What Happened at Court Time
Last edited by Round Mound; 10-28-2011 at 02:10 AM.
-
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Last edited by DevilsAssassin; 10-28-2011 at 02:09 AM.
-
phal5
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
I don't hate stats. Your problem is you use them as the end all be all when ranking/analyzing players.
Bill Russell is overrated? That's cute
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Originally Posted by D-Wade316
Win SHARES...is SHARING That means that TEAM VALUE is More Important than Individual and Russell Played with like 7 HOFs 5-6 of them in his Prime and Their Primes. Better Stat is Defensive Reating DRT.
Russell was a monster Rebounder, Shot Blocker and Defender yeah and so was Rodman but he was A ZERO Offensive Force. He played 1 End.
Last edited by Round Mound; 10-28-2011 at 02:12 AM.
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
Wade has been somewhat more statistically productive yes, but not better, so much goes into such a small difference in stats when stats cant accurately measure defense and most importantly clutchness, or wait a minute clutchness can be somewhat measured in stats actually.
I believe if you go here and look at the gamewinners and clutch productions you will find the answer: www.82games.com
Then we have the jewelry difference aswell.
-
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
wades 2006 performance against the pistons is probably one of the best playoff series i've ever seen. its better than his finals performance by a solid margin in my opinion.
he was absolutely incredible that series. shame he came in with the flu for the last game. i cant imagine how much better his stats would have been if he played healthy.
-
#Trump4Treason
Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant
well you have to factor in kobe comming into the league at 18, first and second year he was comming off the bench and i think his third year also? he was still maturing to the nba game for a while. So factoring in those seasons to his stats would definitly hurt.....while dwyane wade came into the league with already college experience at 22 years old.
-
............
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|