-
Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
This is very true and most people would shrug off the idea that Pierce has an argument over Bird as the greatest Celtic. Here's is Mike Gorman, play by play guy for the Celtics, his opinion on Pierce vs Bird.
[QUOTE]
-
NBA All-star
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
-
Please clap.
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Larry Bird has 28/10/6 seasons. Larry Bird has 3 MVPs.
**Print Screen**
Wipe ass
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Some more quotes on those that agree with me from the Celtic hierarchy.
[QUOTE]
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
Larry Bird has 28/10/6 seasons. Larry Bird has 3 MVPs.
**Print Screen**
Wipe ass
Please stop trolling in my thread.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
pierce is a very good clutch player. but common he's like top 70 all time. bird is top 10
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
I think I would take Pierce also.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
While I agree that Pierce is very underrated, Bird is a top 6 player all-time. Pierce is not more clutch than Larry.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
pierce is a very good clutch player. but common he's like top 70 all time. bird is top 10
Why does that matter?
People on here are too obsessed with rankings.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
pierce is a very good clutch player. but common he's like top 70 all time. bird is top 10
People are overrating Bird. This is the same guy people have above Kobe on their top 10 list when Bostonians and Celtics' hierarchy are making claims that Bird may not even be the best Celtic player.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by TheReal Kendall
Why does that matter?
People on here are too obsessed with rankings.
ya who cares if a player is one of the top 10 players ever and the other is top 70-80 all time. why should how good a player have anything to do with whom you'd rather have taking the last shot
especially when that top 10 player ever is probably more or at least just as clutch as the 70-80th ranked player
bird might not be easly picked over a modern day legend such as lebron or kobe
but over pierce? common its not even a question.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by TheReal Kendall
I think I would take Pierce also.
Here are Boston fans going crazy for Pierce when he passed Larry. Obviously the cheers and ovation really put into perspective of how good Pierce is.
Larry had the better resume due to great teams.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux9GPp9_z8Q
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
ya who cares if a player is one of the top 10 players ever and the other is top 70-80 all time. why should how good a player have anything to do with whom you'd rather have taking the last shot
especially when that top 10 player ever is probably more or at least just as clutch as the 70-80th ranked player
bird might not be easly picked over a modern day legend such as lebron or kobe
but over pierce? common its not even a question.
Most of his success is due to the great team he was on.
I get what you're saying but most of those people on the all time list had great teams.
You could take the #15 person on the list and he probably wouldn't be able to beat the #70 person on there 1 on 1.
I just don't put too much stock in the all time list cause like I said some is individual success and some due to being on great teams.
-
Re: Mike Gorman: I want ball in Pierce's hands than Bird
Originally Posted by TheReal Kendall
Most of his success is due to the great team he was on.
I get what you're saying but most of those people on the all time list had great teams.
You could take the #15 person on the list and he probably wouldn't be able to beat the #70 person on there 1 on 1.
I just don't put too much stock in the all time list cause like I said some is individual success and some due to being on great teams.
There is no doubt Pierce's career parallels that of Larry.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|