If Player A can destroy Player B in 1-on-1, and also win more in 5-on-5, then

[3ball]

[COLOR="DarkRed"]And yes they'd enjoy the same albeit smaller size advantage over Lebron[/COLOR] you numb skull that was my point in the 1st place

.

Exactly, so who cares

The issue is that MJ and Kobe would destroy lebron 1-on-1, while also being better at 5-on-5.. so they're better...

[RRR3]

MJ struggled with Scott Burrell one on one but he’s gonna beat LeBron?

[sdot_thadon]

Exactly, so who cares

The issue is that MJ and Kobe would destroy lebron 1-on-1, while also being better at 5-on-5.. so they're better...

So you just spent several posts arguing a point you already agreed with?

Sounds more like cutting your losses but whatever buddy.

[RRR3]

So you just spent several posts arguing a point you already agreed with?

Sounds more like cutting your losses but whatever buddy.

This dude legit thinks he’s a 6’7 superathlete who dunked over Zach Randolph.

[sdot_thadon]

[QUOTE=RRR3]This dude legit thinks he

[3ball]

So you just spent several posts arguing a point you already agreed with?

Sounds more like cutting your losses but whatever buddy.

No, you spent several posts deflecting and avoiding the point

Lebron is a worse 1-on-1 and 5-on-5 player than Kobe/MJ, and is therefore an inferior basketball player

Now go ahead and avoid the point like you've been doing