-
The Sheriff
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
Originally Posted by dreamwarrior
He looked just like DLO as a rookie. Super slow, worse handles, a little better of a shooter...
Curry was dropping 40 point games and 30 point games gtfo
-
College superstar
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
I still remember peeps wanting to move him to SG with Monta at the point.
Having Jarrett Jack at point in 2012 did help his development.
-
Game. Set. Match.
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
I was pissed when we drafted Curry.
-
WayOfWade
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
Originally Posted by Heavincent
Yeah, Steph definitely has limited upside and is more of a bench player.
The question mark after means that they are not stating a fact, but rather are not sure about it.
Capiche?
-
Great college starter
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
Originally Posted by KungFuJoe
Curry is, at worst, an average defender. He applies decent pressure and he comes up with steals. NBA PGs can't guard each other anyways. Too quick. It's always a team effort.
Although at times he has trouble against quick guards and he lacks defensive versatility. he's motivated and focused consistently on the defensive end so I'd say he's at worst an above average defender.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
some lowkey meltdowns ITT
-
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
It's obvious that whoever wrote the report is a retard. I hate people who focus solely on athleticism and not at all on actual skill.
The dude took some shitty D3 team to the NCAA quarterfinals if I recall correctly. Obvious he was going to be legit.
I think the author of that report is an ISH poster.
-
The Awakening
-
NBA Legend
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
OP you stupid or something? Curry takes like 12 3 pointers a game and leads the league in that, so yes he relies heavily on his outside shot. Not a true PG is arguable but isn't that what everybody used to say about Westbrook? Curry averages like 6 APG and that's not a traditional PG role, so that's not thread worthy either, neither is the "college system makes him hard to evaluate".
Just because he has been incredible for a few years you going to act like he was a clear cut MVP caliber player from the start?
For the record, this is the whole list, including a long list of strengths:
-
talk less, say more
Re: Steph Curry evaluations pre Draft 2009
How could he have been evaluated any differently? There is literally nothing other than a deal with the devil that could make a player with Curry's build and athletic ability any better than a fringe starter.
Think about what he has to do to be competitive, never mind the MVP. He literally scoops in layups from 15 feet and pulls up over 7 footers from 30 feet several times a game.... to score 25 or 30. Nobody in the game's history has ever been able to sustain that sort of thing before. Why not Eddie House? Why not Isaiah Thomas (the active one...)?
Curry is completely outside the realm of what's possible without Satanic ritual or voodoo. Nobody could have predicted this.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|