Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,751

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dresta
    Nah, Miami would've been bounced by Indiana with Hardon on the team instead of Wade.
    Harden and Allen at the same time?

    Chalmers benefits.

  2. #17
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,751

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by Warfan

    He didn't even make the first team. Top 3 pointguard & top 10 player easily...
    question for the league, has making the PG position extremely competitive actually made the league worse?

    kinda like how Kobe/Shaq/Lebron all make players who play with them worse.

    [COLOR="White"]or you know, they make players use-less, same for awards as well[/COLOR]

  3. #18
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,751

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by jzek
    Wade's stats the past two playoffs is no better than that of Mo Williams in Cleveland. In fact, Mo's is slightly BETTER!

    for **** sake, I will introduce another factor. variance. Dwayne Wade probably have a better possibility of going off on a scoring rampage than Mo Williams.

  4. #19
    Not airballing my layups anymore
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    108

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jameerthefear
    At this point? Wade doesn't really have anything over him right now tbh.
    If we are talking about NOW of course harden is better now.

  5. #20
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,666

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Wade has really fallen off this year. He's still a better player than Harden though.

  6. #21
    A humble prophet Dresta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Medina
    Posts
    9,830

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by GimmeThat
    for **** sake, I will introduce another factor. variance. Dwayne Wade probably have a better possibility of going off on a scoring rampage than Mo Williams.
    He also has far better averages. That guy is just talking shit.

  7. #22
    alternick = loser :D veilside23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    P.I.
    Posts
    3,795

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by red1
    at this point I feel like anybody > wade RIP d-lord


  8. #23
    meat mountain avonbarksdale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    tdotwire
    Posts
    1,411

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    harden obvioulsy the guy drops 30 all the time 40 sometimes he gets triple doubles etc

    wade sucks most of the time

  9. #24
    YMCA Scrub ZMonkey11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    2,034

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dresta
    That just isn't true at all. Wade's stats the last two playoffs have been considerably better than Mo Williams' playoff stats (PER of 13 and 12 in his two seasons). Wade's PER this playoff run is still 20, which is still the output of an all-star caliber player.

    12>20 tho?
    All this blah blah blah and when you watch the guy play, you see him pass out of at least 5 jump shots a game, can't get to the rim, has trouble making layups, and bitches about everything.

    Yea, his per is intact when you play like a puss.

  10. #25
    I go HAM TheCorporation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    LBJ = GOAT
    Posts
    12,740

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jameerthefear
    At this point? Wade doesn't really have anything over him right now tbh.
    He certainly has things over him, but father time is undefeated.

    Wade has better defense, and is more efficient.

    Harden does have a clear advantage in the 3-point shooting department, his averages of the last 3 years:

    39% in 2012
    37% in 2013
    37% in 2014

    Something Wade would never touch

    For lol reference, Wade's last three years:

    27% in 2012
    26% in 2013
    28% in 2014
    Last edited by TheCorporation; 06-14-2014 at 03:22 PM.

  11. #26
    Mozart Basketball no pun intended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    6,520

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Nope, but it is set in stone that Ginobili>Wade>Harden

  12. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    TD Garden
    Posts
    7,443

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    Harden is a loser, I would take a hobbled Wade over him anyday, at least one tries on defence.

  13. #28
    Back to Business
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    2,586

    Default Re: So is it set in stone that Harden>Wade?

    yea wade isnt even better than joe johnson at this point...sorry...great career tho..hall of famer..make no mistake about that but if u building a team today to win it all or to compete in international play..harden is the FIRST sg u calling...point blank period

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •