-
Local High School Star
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
because hes not as good as you guys think.
this is probably the best response. nate robinson is a solid role player, but he doenst deserve the money hes gonna get in denver. he won't put up those numbers ever again, he'll probably even have a rough season because denver is such a hard place to play until you're used to it. i like him and i love his passion, but he isn't going to put up those numbers regularly like he did in the couple play off games against the nets who had no defense/heart at all.
-
Wild 100's
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
because hes not as good as you guys think.
Exactly.
We don't need him with Rose and Hinrich....people have no clue about the biusiness of basketballyet talk shit like morons, smh, it gets old...
Nate Robinson is a very flawed player with poor defense, streaky shooting, and a serious ego problem...I liked himokay i guess but the love for him in a Bull's uni got outta control...he is a journeyman, not an essential cog to a championship/playoff team.
-
Decent college freshman
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by Go Getter
Exactly.
We don't need him with Rose and Hinrich....people have no clue about the biusiness of basketballyet talk shit like morons, smh, it gets old...
Nate Robinson is a very flawed player with poor defense, streaky shooting, and a serious ego problem...I liked himokay i guess but the love for him in a Bull's uni got outta control...he is a journeyman, not an essential cog to a championship/playoff team.
you clearly know nothing about basketball, jeff delete this guys account pls
-
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Bulls need a SG not a midget PG.
They already got a backup in Hinrich.
But Lil Nate got heart though
-
Laker Nation
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
cause Rose feels threatened.
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
I think Thibs didn't like his play style, but against the heat his hands were tied and had to play Nate (injuries to Deng, Rose & Hinrich).
They weren't gonna pay him money to play behind all their guards when rose is back.
-
Wild 100's
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
What people don't realize is while he scored slightly more than Hinrich he shot worse from the field and 3 than Kirk (Kirk had a very poor year from the line though--I think that can be ironed out) while playing significantly less effective defense.
I like Nate's heart but it just wasn't n the cards. We need a SG and backup center much more than we need him.
-
I Run NY.
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Because he's a pain in the ass to control and to get to do what you want on a day to day basis. They got tired of him. Everyone does. At this point, do people think it's a conincidence he plays well and then the team dumps him anyway?
-
#Dre Day in Sac Town
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Are the Bulls high on Jeff Teague's brother as well? On top of that you got Hinrich to provide shutdown D and shooting and Rose is back so they don't really need what Robinson brings.
-
Wild 100's
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by niko
Because he's a pain in the ass to control and to get to do what you want on a day to day basis. They got tired of him. Everyone does. At this point, do people think it's a conincidence he plays well and then the team dumps him anyway?
Even when he was playing well opposing PGs would shoot over and drive past him with no reservations.
-
Down with GLOBALISM
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by theaussieguy
you clearly know nothing about basketball, jeff delete this guys account pls
Are you sure? Because I think he was pretty spot on...
Go Getter isn't a guy on ISH that I would be pointing out a lack of knowledge man
-
Down with GLOBALISM
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by andremiller07
Are the Bulls high on Jeff Teague's brother as well? On top of that you got Hinrich to provide shutdown D and shooting and Rose is back so they don't really need what Robinson brings.
Yes, Marquis Teague had a solid summer league and looks to be a promising backup PG. So that makes 3 capable PG's, there was no need to keep Nate on the team.
-
NBA Finals MVP
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by kNicKz
Yes.
But with that said, they have constructed a great team
Not great. Decent, competitive.
-
Down with GLOBALISM
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Originally Posted by niko
Because he's a pain in the ass to control and to get to do what you want on a day to day basis. They got tired of him. Everyone does. At this point, do people think it's a conincidence he plays well and then the team dumps him anyway?
This.
The difference between his good and bad games were often a detriment to the team. I like Nate, but he is nothing more than a sparkplug.
-
Wild 100's
Re: Why did the bulls let nate robinson go ?
Adding Dunleavy is bigger than losing Nate imho. I think the coach's son is going to be one of those under-the-radar signings that nets big results.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|