-
FACT
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
He didn't hit him on the arm. All things being equal, Durant hit HIM on the arm. His hand was already there. It's not like he hacked him. he contested his shot. He didn't throw his arm off balance or anything, push his elbow... he simply put his hand in the way and Durant shot through it.
Edit: Pause at 54. I know I'm not going to change your mind, but be realistic.
-Smak
I take it you haven't watched basketball for very long?
Look at CJ's arm, he is initiating the contact. It's a foul. You can't hit someone on the arm as they go to shoot.
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
No argument. It happened, no foul was called. I'm explaining why it wasn't. I was skeptical and thought it was a foul at first, but after watching it on the replay during the game then multiple times on youtube (51-55, watch it yourself) I believe it wasn't a foul.
You act like I need to make some excuse for the refs. lol. I'm not the one crying about the outcome.
-Smak
look, i understand the no call. while its sad for the game to end like that, i get it. i woulda done the same thing.
but even if the offensive player "initiates" the contact (which I don't see), that's a foul. the hand shouldn't be there. defenders aren't aloud to impede a shot like that. durant couldn't follow through. if that's not a foul, every nba player would defend like that.
-
Shit just got serious
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by w00terz
I take it you haven't watched basketball for very long?
Look at CJ's arm, he is initiating the contact. It's a foul. You can't hit someone on the arm as they go to shoot.
He did more then that. He jumped, which means he is out of position, he put his hand up and attempted to block the shot and instead hit arm and you have to give the shooter his space otherwise refs are known to call a foul. It so obvious too. I guess common sense ain't common.
-
Playoff Rondo
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Easily a foul. Thunder got robbed.
-
Life goes on.
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by w00terz
I take it you haven't watched basketball for very long?
Look at CJ's arm, he is initiating the contact. It's a foul. You can't hit someone on the arm as they go to shoot.
Thank you for posting that. I think that proves everything.
BTW, he's... not hitting his arm? He's about .1 seconds away from getting his hand on the ball. After which point Durants arm motion 'shoots' through it.
-Smak
-
Samurai Chef
Re: A foul or a no-call?
It was a blatant foul, even more than what I expected. From what I was hearing I thought it was going to be a basic foul on a shooter. He clearly caught his on the arm on the shot but it happens I guess.
Last edited by Xsatyr; 04-07-2010 at 01:21 AM.
-
I hit open 5-foot jumpshots with ease
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
Thank you for posting that. I think that proves everything.
BTW, he's... not hitting his arm? He's about .1 seconds away from getting his hand on the ball. After which point Durants arm motion 'shoots' through it.
-Smak
i don't think he hit the ball, and even if durant "shoots" through it, its a foul
-
FACT
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
Thank you for posting that. I think that proves everything.
BTW, he's... not hitting his arm? He's about .1 seconds away from getting his hand on the ball. After which point Durants arm motion 'shoots' through it.
-Smak
-
Re: A foul or a no-call?
-
Samurai Chef
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
He didn't hit him on the arm. All things being equal, Durant hit HIM on the arm. His hand was already there. It's not like he hacked him. he contested his shot. He didn't throw his arm off balance or anything, push his elbow... he simply put his hand in the way and Durant shot through it.
Edit: Pause at 54. I know I'm not going to change your mind, but be realistic.
-Smak
That is a foul, sry but everyone knows that you can't touch a shooter. If your hands are in the area where a shooter's arms are going then move them bc it will be a foul.
-
Life goes on.
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by paintingshade
i don't think he hit the ball, and even if durant "shoots" through it, its a foul
My last post,
he did hit the ball, and because he hit the ball, what happens afterwards should be disregarded. If he hadn't gotten a piece of the ball then I can see where you are coming from, so if you want to believe he didn't, then I guess you would be right.
Joyner, look at frame 2. He clearly has his hand on the ball.
-Smak
-
Old School Cool
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by joyner82
lol...obvious foul.
-
FACT
Re: A foul or a no-call?
-
Samurai Chef
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Originally Posted by ILLsmak
My last post,
he did hit the ball, and because he hit the ball, what happens afterwards should be disregarded. If he hadn't gotten a piece of the ball then I can see where you are coming from, so if you want to believe he didn't, then I guess you would be right.
Joyner, look at frame 2. He clearly has his hand on the ball.
-Smak
I can still see the blue paint between them on frame two so no.
-
Great college starter
Re: A foul or a no-call?
Why would you post the screencap of before the contact in question?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|