-
NBA lottery pick
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
It looks like Kareems the one that retired in the 70s
-
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
Dwight??? The 6-9 265 lb Dwight...against a near 7-2 Wilt, who weighed between 290-310 for much of his career, and who bullied the likes of 6-11 265 lb. Bob Lanier?
As for Shaq...
How do you explain this...
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1&p2=onealsh01
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
he would get BULLIED by tougher bodies like Shaq and Dwight it would be a travesty to his 2 rings.
Are Bullies the smaller ones where you're from?
-
The One
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
-
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Wilt was USED TO having no competition in his era. The sudden influx of tougher man at the center position would shock him so bad he will cry. Dwight, Shaq, Hakeem, Ewing, even Demarcus Cousins would eat Wilt alive.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by CelticBaller
hes dead
And prop up his corpse under the basket, and 90% of today's centers would not score a point on him...
-
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
This is the guy that choked in multiple playoffs and ended up with only 2 rings in an era where Bill Russell dominated for 11 rings. I think it's obvious what today's center will do to Wilt, it's gonna be sad to see Shaq abuse him.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
Wilt was USED TO having no competition in his era. The sudden influx of tougher man at the center position would shock him so bad he will cry. Dwight, Shaq, Hakeem, Ewing, even Demarcus Cousins would eat Wilt alive.
WILT
Russell- 142
Bellamy- 108
reed 74
Nate- 64
Kareem- 28
unseld- 20
Lanier 16
Totat= 452
SHAQ
Duncan 62
Robinson- 40
Mutombo-29
Hakeem- 28
Ewing- 26
Ming 18
Mourning 16
Total Games= 219
Wilt played more than twice the amount of games against his top 7 piers than shaq
-
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
Probably the same reason that MJ didn't win any rings from '85 to '90. Or Shaq not winning rings in 16 of his 20 seasons. Or Duncan "failing" in 13 of his. Or KAJ "losing" in 14 of his. And Hakeem...hell he couldn't get past the first round in the majority of his 18 seasons. What about him? Were Eaton, Thompson, AC Green, etc. etc, just too much for him?
Please...
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
His teams were far superior more than most of the time, and most of his teammates were healthy and or able to play. But I know you're trolling because the arguments have been destroyed in the past by posters who know a lot more than myself. But even my simple arguments shit on your bullshit. My shit trumps your shit
-
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
Probably the same reason that MJ didn't win any rings from '85 to '90. Or Shaq not winning rings in 16 of his 20 seasons. Or Duncan "failing" in 13 of his. Or KAJ "losing" in 14 of his. And Hakeem...hell he couldn't get past the first round in the majority of his 18 seasons. What about him? Were Eaton, Thompson, AC Green, etc. etc, just too much for him?
Please...
His main rival got more than 5x the amount of rings he has. That is just pathetic and speaks a lot about how overrated his stats are compared to actually winning.
-
Buck Dynasty
Re: Wilt Chamberlain looks as if he could of played 30+ years had he wanted
Originally Posted by GoranDragon
Please explain why he only have 2 rings in an era where Russell got 11. Please do explain that.
Same reason why Lebron only has 2 in a decade.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|