Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1
    sahelanthropus fpliii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    9,665

    Default Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?


  2. #2
    Buckle up Bucket_Nakedz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    2,710

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    well the season hasn't even started. anything can happen, remember michael beasley?

  3. #3
    NBA sixth man of the year KyrieTheFuture's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    7,489

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Julius Randle has always been 1a and 1b depending on who you talk to and a couple other guys are one good college season away from taking #1 (Harrison Twins, Aaron Gordon and and I'm forgetting someone else)

  4. #4
    7-time NBA All-Star KG215's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    12,274

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bucket_Nakedz
    well the season hasn't even started. anything can happen, remember michael beasley?
    Not sure what you mean by Beasley. He was a monster in his one-and-done season. And it was right after the one-and-done rule got put in place. People were going crazy over how unreal Durant's freshman year was at Texas the first year of the one-and-done rule, then Beasley came along the next year and had that was just as good, if not better.

    It was Harrison Barnes who came out of high school, was named preseason All-American and got a lot of hype without playing a game. People kind of forget that he actually had a pretty good freshman season, it just didn't live up to the ridiculous hype and unfair expectations he was getting before ever playing in a college game.

  5. #5
    The Sheriff FreezingTsmoove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    10,066

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Andre Drummond took the same path Wiggins took (coming out of HS 1 year earlier) super athletic big who everyone had #1 on their mock drafts as the #1 of 2012. He didnt play like a #1 pick at UConn and dropped all the way to 10 somehow. I can see the same happening to Wiggins (not dropping to 10 but somewhere in the top 3) especially with such a loaded draft. I can easily see Marcus Smart being the #1 pick. Even Aaron Gordon if he goes off this year. Julius Randle as well

  6. #6
    Local High School Star TheReturn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,275

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    There's will always be people looking to hate on the consensus high potentials.

  7. #7
    7-time NBA All-Star statman32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    11,863

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Quote Originally Posted by FreezingTsmoove
    Andre Drummond took the same path Wiggins took (coming out of HS 1 year earlier) super athletic big who everyone had #1 on their mock drafts as the #1 of 2012. He didnt play like a #1 pick at UConn and dropped all the way to 10 somehow. I can see the same happening to Wiggins (not dropping to 10 but somewhere in the top 3) especially with such a loaded draft. I can easily see Marcus Smart being the #1 pick. Even Aaron Gordon if he goes off this year. Julius Randle as well
    You have no idea what you are talking about. There was no talk about Drummond being the indisputable #1 pick. Before,during, or after his freshmen year at Uconn. He was simply one of the few options along with Barnes, Davis and a few others.

    He also DID NOT come out of HS early. He was going to a 5th year prep school, but decided on going to UConn instead.

  8. #8
    College superstar JMT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,543

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Quote Originally Posted by statman32
    You have no idea what you are talking about. There was no talk about Drummond being the indisputable #1 pick. Before,during, or after his freshmen year at Uconn. He was simply one of the few options along with Barnes, Davis and a few others.

    He also DID NOT come out of HS early. He was going to a 5th year prep school, but decided on going to UConn instead.
    Spot on. Not to mention that Drummond is a legit big at 6'10" and 260+, while Wiggins is 6'7"/6'8" and about 210 soaking wet.

    There are a ton of scenarios where a kid that size who hasn't even played a college game ends up being less than the #1.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    12,636

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    No one is a lock going into college, especially in this class there's a number of impressive players who could develop over the season to steal the spot. Wiggins could struggle or have aspects of his game exposed and drop himself.

  10. #10
    L alenleomessi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    10,746

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    even if wiggins struggles i cant see anyone passing on him

  11. #11
    Decent college freshman Mr. Incredible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,638

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    I see him struggling to live up to the hype.

  12. #12
    Great college starter SyRyanYang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    AKLD,NZ
    Posts
    3,480

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    I think what he really lacks is motivation.

  13. #13
    The Sheriff FreezingTsmoove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    10,066

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    Quote Originally Posted by statman32
    You have no idea what you are talking about. There was no talk about Drummond being the indisputable #1 pick. Before,during, or after his freshmen year at Uconn. He was simply one of the few options along with Barnes, Davis and a few others.

    He also DID NOT come out of HS early. He was going to a 5th year prep school, but decided on going to UConn instead.
    WTF you have no idea what you were talking about. When Andre was a HS Senior everyone had him as the number 1 pick in the draft. I follow HS basketball a lot there were tons of mocks that had him going #1

  14. #14
    The Sheriff FreezingTsmoove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    10,066

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    http://espn.go.com/college-sports/ba...andre-drummond

    Please tell me more how the #2 player in the nation, a 6'10 athletic as **** big wasn't the #1 mock for the 2012 draft. The only reason his stock dropped so low during the draft was because how high it was before his freshman season.

  15. #15
    Local High School Star BIZARRO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    1,318

    Default Re: Andrew Wiggins is not a lock at #1?

    I remember going to the McDonald's game and seeing EXACTLY what the GM's in the article said about him. And then I remember coming on here and getting ripped at the same time for saying it.

    The kid has got zero aura about him, and although he has sick hops, he just blends in. Anyone who ranks him above Jabari Parker currently is high.

    Parker and Randle are sick almost can't miss talents. This kid might one day be good, but he is not a break out talent (yet) by any means.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •