Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 50 of 50
  1. #46
    Not airballing my layups anymore winnnaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    145

    Default Re: Is the SG position officially the weakest position now?

    Centre position is.

  2. #47
    Roy Hibbert Super Star InspiredLebowski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Birthplace of basketball
    Posts
    22,187

    Default Re: Is the SG position officially the weakest position now?

    Quote Originally Posted by Whoah10115
    Granger gonna get traded. Better hope sooner, rather than later.


    Get you some Gordon.


    Everyone is better than Joe Johnson (who's also better as a 3).
    People need to stop with this trade Granger stuff. It makes no sense. Dump a top 6ish SF whose shooting is SORELY needed for spare parts from a team that's greater than the sum of it's parts.

  3. #48
    The Banner Magic bird's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Causeway Street
    Posts
    962

    Default Re: Is the SG position officially the weakest position now?

    Quote Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
    People need to stop with this trade Granger stuff. It makes no sense. Dump a top 6ish SF whose shooting is SORELY needed for spare parts from a team that's greater than the sum of it's parts.
    The Pacers are playing better than i expected without Granger, they need his 3 pt shooting, Paul George can't shoot 3's at a high enough percentage.

  4. #49
    How I feel in ur head maybeshewill13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    5,609

    Default Re: Is the SG position officially the weakest position now?

    Quote Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
    People need to stop with this trade Granger stuff. It makes no sense. Dump a top 6ish SF whose shooting is SORELY needed for spare parts from a team that's greater than the sum of it's parts.
    I like Paul George because he's got two first names

  5. #50
    Linja Status Whoah10115's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    8,474

    Default Re: Is the SG position officially the weakest position now?

    Quote Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
    People need to stop with this trade Granger stuff. It makes no sense. Dump a top 6ish SF whose shooting is SORELY needed for spare parts from a team that's greater than the sum of it's parts.


    No, the Pacers have to actually do it. In the end, he needs to go. Paul George playing the 2 doesn't help them at all. The offense moves a lot more smoothly when he plays where he's supposed to play.


    Also, Hill is not suitable as your starting PG if you don't give him another ball-handler in the backcourt. You need someone who can shoot but you need it to not be Granger. He also has the dumbest chip on his shoulder and he's not the team leader, but he plays the part. Time to go.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •