-
Good college starter
Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
I think so. When it comes down to it. It dont matter wether u win as the worst player. Winnings winning.
-
well well well
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
-
High School Starter
-
Good college starter
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
Originally Posted by Kobe_6/8
Absolutely. Eat shit losers lol. But but look at your stats. No gold tho homie. No gold.
-
Devin Booker MVP
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
-
well well well
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
Originally Posted by Prime_Shaq
Winning > Losing
good luck explaining that to the lebron family
-
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
Hmmm, good analysis, and solid discussion, but winning FMVP is the only thing that matters.
-
Good college starter
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
Originally Posted by dubeta
Hmmm, good analysis, and solid discussion, but winning FMVP is the only thing that matters.
And u dont have a chance of winning that when you lose unless....... jerry west > lebron james
-
0.28571428571
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
Winning is all that matters. If you don't win, then who cares?
-
College superstar
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
-
NBA All-star
Re: Is winning a ring as the second best player greater then losing as the best player?
yes, half a ring is better than no ring.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|