Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 74
  1. #1
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,431

    Default If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    The Warriors are moving the ball around like its 2016 and Steph Curry is playing like an MVP again. If they win it all with KD still on the shelf, what would that say about KD's two rings?

    We already don't value them as it is, but would this be the final nail in the coffin?

  2. #2
    Local High School Star nayte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    bottom of the planet
    Posts
    1,739

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.

  3. #3
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,431

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by nayte
    No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.
    Most NBA fans don't put any merit on KD's rings.

    Them winning without him would only further that claim.

  4. #4
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,793

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Obviously.

  5. #5
    SexLand Uncle Drew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Land of 1 Championship
    Posts
    11,347

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    How can valueless rings get any less valuable?

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    ISH Legend since 2009
    Posts
    8,702

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    well they only needed him to beat lebron cause currys a beta male when facing his idol


    so not really. not to anyone with a brain. they were barely worth anything to begin with TBH

  7. #7
    3-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    10,646

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wally450
    The Warriors are moving the ball around like its 2016 and Steph Curry is playing like an MVP again. If they win it all with KD still on the shelf, what would that say about KD's two rings?

    We already don't value them as it is, but would this be the final nail in the coffin?
    No more than you would devalue Steph's rings. What's the difference between what the warriors are doing now without kd and what the warriors did in 16 without Steph? The warriors are a true system. Dray,Klay and Steph are equally important

  8. #8
    ... on a leash ArbitraryWater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    I walk a higher path, son
    Posts
    46,752

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?


  9. #9
    I go HAM TheCorporation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    LBJ = GOAT
    Posts
    12,740

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wally450
    Most NBA fans don't put any merit on KD's rings.

    Them winning without him would only further that claim.
    High IQ poster

  10. #10
    NBA sixth man of the year Levity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    long beach bred
    Posts
    7,903

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    really sucks for KD that you guys dont value his rings

  11. #11
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,793

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Levity
    really sucks for KD that you guys dont value his rings
    Sarcasm aside, it clearly matters to him. If it didn't he wouldn't have burner accounts defending himself. Everyone knows what a sensitive little nancy he is.

  12. #12
    The Special One k0kakw0rld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    GOATHAM CITY
    Posts
    12,982

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by nayte
    No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.
    C.J. Mccollum voiced his opinion on the KD situation. But again your opinion matters more than the rest of the world so yeah...

  13. #13
    NBA sixth man of the year Levity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    long beach bred
    Posts
    7,903

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Quote Originally Posted by Smoke117
    Everyone knows what a sensitive little nancy he is.
    Oh i know. i still get a good laugh at picturing his self-thrown championship parade he had in DC that no one showed up to.

    That look of defeat on his face while celebrating his championship will forever be lul worthy to me.

  14. #14
    Very good NBA starter elementally morale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    8,395

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    Only if he fails to win at least another ring on another team as the best player. If KD goes elsewhere and he can win 1-2 or two rings as the leader, that's a top 15 career easily. Maybe top 10. (Same for Steph w/o KD.) If KD doesn't win on his own... that will devalue his rings.

  15. #15
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer DMAVS41's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    29,706

    Default Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?

    I don't think they will win without him, but yea...if they win a ring this year without him...of course it does.

    Because it wouldn't even be with another player in place of him...it would be straight up without him.

    Again, I don't think they will...I think they'll wear down, but if they did? Yea, how could anyone argue otherwise?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •