-
Cancer
If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
The Warriors are moving the ball around like its 2016 and Steph Curry is playing like an MVP again. If they win it all with KD still on the shelf, what would that say about KD's two rings?
We already don't value them as it is, but would this be the final nail in the coffin?
-
Local High School Star
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.
-
Cancer
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by nayte
No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.
Most NBA fans don't put any merit on KD's rings.
Them winning without him would only further that claim.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
-
SexLand
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
How can valueless rings get any less valuable?
-
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
well they only needed him to beat lebron cause currys a beta male when facing his idol
so not really. not to anyone with a brain. they were barely worth anything to begin with TBH
-
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by Wally450
The Warriors are moving the ball around like its 2016 and Steph Curry is playing like an MVP again. If they win it all with KD still on the shelf, what would that say about KD's two rings?
We already don't value them as it is, but would this be the final nail in the coffin?
No more than you would devalue Steph's rings. What's the difference between what the warriors are doing now without kd and what the warriors did in 16 without Steph? The warriors are a true system. Dray,Klay and Steph are equally important
-
... on a leash
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
-
I go HAM
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by Wally450
Most NBA fans don't put any merit on KD's rings.
Them winning without him would only further that claim.
High IQ poster
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
really sucks for KD that you guys dont value his rings
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by Levity
really sucks for KD that you guys dont value his rings
Sarcasm aside, it clearly matters to him. If it didn't he wouldn't have burner accounts defending himself. Everyone knows what a sensitive little nancy he is.
-
The Special One
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by nayte
No offence but only u retards devalue them. Which there is alot so don't be lonely.
C.J. Mccollum voiced his opinion on the KD situation. But again your opinion matters more than the rest of the world so yeah...
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Originally Posted by Smoke117
Everyone knows what a sensitive little nancy he is.
Oh i know. i still get a good laugh at picturing his self-thrown championship parade he had in DC that no one showed up to.
That look of defeat on his face while celebrating his championship will forever be lul worthy to me.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
Only if he fails to win at least another ring on another team as the best player. If KD goes elsewhere and he can win 1-2 or two rings as the leader, that's a top 15 career easily. Maybe top 10. (Same for Steph w/o KD.) If KD doesn't win on his own... that will devalue his rings.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: If the Warriors win it all without KD, does that devalue his rings even more?
I don't think they will win without him, but yea...if they win a ring this year without him...of course it does.
Because it wouldn't even be with another player in place of him...it would be straight up without him.
Again, I don't think they will...I think they'll wear down, but if they did? Yea, how could anyone argue otherwise?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|