-
03-04-2013, 10:33 PM
#136
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Originally Posted by imdaman99
why isnt the salty cavs announcer repeating "get that weak stuff outa here" over and over after chandler swats the shit outa kyrie
-
03-04-2013, 10:57 PM
#137
The Paterfamilias
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Originally Posted by imdaman99
why isnt the salty cavs announcer repeating "get that weak stuff outa here" over and over after chandler swats the shit outa kyrie
Why on earth would the Cavs' own announcer do that? I know it was a strange game, but that would have been the most bizarre moment of the entire night.
That was about as bad a loss as a 20-win team can have.
-
03-04-2013, 10:58 PM
#138
The People's Choice
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
For some reason we DO NOT match up with the Cavs. THEY ALWAYS wreck us like wtf.
-
03-05-2013, 12:01 AM
#139
Troll spotting pro
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Amare played great. Not really surprising, he's been playing great for a while, but he actually got shots and minutes.
He basically filled in for Melo, but the difference in the game was that guys did ultimately finish and hit shots today.
But Amare has to play more.
-
03-05-2013, 12:46 AM
#140
7/11/14 We Witness
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Just got done watching the game. WTF is up with Byron Scott having only TT as the only big at the last few seconds of the 4th QT. That cost them the game I would put Speights and TT at the same time that way Amare wouldn't had back down my little guard. It didn't happen but the problem came when Amare missed his jumper and nothing but guards were trying to rebound the ball against Chandler. Wait actually it really wasn't his fault since the Cavs had a 22pt lead and failed hard.
-
03-05-2013, 12:51 AM
#141
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Cavs are a playoff team next year imo. Probably more beneficial for them to lose games at this point for a better pick.
-
03-05-2013, 01:05 AM
#142
Utryin2getthepipe?
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Originally Posted by RoundMoundOfReb
Cavs are a playoff team next year imo. Probably more beneficial for them to lose games at this point for a better pick.
I definitely see them making it next year assuming everyone is healthy. With Dirk not his regular self, Kyrie is probably my favourite non Knick in the league.
-
03-05-2013, 03:03 AM
#143
National High School Star
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Really annoying that they were able to acquire Speights for a second round pick...he has holes in his game but hes anreal nice offensive contributor....solid piece for any team, great value.
-
03-05-2013, 07:23 AM
#144
RETIRED, ISH 2008-2013
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
CAVALIERZ
-
03-05-2013, 08:02 AM
#145
Very good NBA starter
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Originally Posted by NewYorkNoPicks
Really annoying that they were able to acquire Speights for a second round pick...he has holes in his game but hes anreal nice offensive contributor....solid piece for any team, great value.
actually we traded jon leuer (played in 16 games, averaged 7mpg) for speights, ellington, selby, and a first rounder in 2015, if it falls in the 5-15 range, or just top five protected in 2017 and 2018
it really shows how valuable cap space is, just to be avbailable to take on salary, you can pick up really solid assets, because teams just want to dump salary, and are willing to give you assets just to do it.
-
03-05-2013, 08:18 AM
#146
I Run NY.
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Cavs need better players, Irving is sick but everyone else is "eh". The other young guys don't look like upper level starters either. I'm sure the Cav fans tell me that's false but you lose most of the time every year, there's a reason. Knicks played terrible in until a few minutes left in the first half. Didn't really play smart for about half the second half either, so many bad shots.
But winning is winning. Showed some guts digging it out. Amare was strong but he needs to stop pausing under the basket so long adn allowing everyone to collapse on him.
-
03-05-2013, 08:35 AM
#147
Stare
Re: New York Knicks (35-21) vs. Cleveland Cavaliers (20-39), 7:00 PM EST
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|