Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?

[ihoopallday]

Just saw a poll on ESPN and fans (51%)believe feel Duncan winning a 5th championship would be more impressive than a LeBron 3 peat.

Thoughts...

[Rocketswin2013]

Wait, that's duncan.....

[Real14]

Lebron earned none of his ringz.

[AnaheimLakers24]

a 3peat an 5 rings is more impressive

[Dr Seuss]

its all about context

so in this case, duncan vs lebron/wade/bosh, id give it to duncan for that longevity while still being a key contributor in the teams success.

[Mass Debator]

5 rings are more impressive if there are no context involved.

Lebron getting a 3-peat is more important and more impressive than Duncan getting 5 rings over the course of 16 years.

[Rocketswin2013]

Peak vs. Longevity. I'll take peak(3-peating)

But tell me this: Is a sidekick ring better than an NBA MVP?

[Kiddlovesnets]

It depends on the role he plays during the title runs. Sidekick 3-peat means very little, and 7 rings means nothing if you are a role player.

[Milbuck]

Peak vs. Longevity. I'll take peak(3-peating)

But tell me this: Is a sidekick ring better than an NBA MVP?

Depends on context. How good was the #1, how good was the sidekick, and how did they both perform in the playoffs?

[kamil]

One does not simply become more impressive with three collusion rings over 5 legitimate rings.

[Real14]

One does not simply become more impressive with three collusion rings over 4 legitimate rings.

fixed

[Solefade]

3peat over 10 years > 5 rings over 16 years

[AnaheimLakers24]

3peat over 10 years > 5 rings over 16 years

anything is better than collusion rings.

04 pistons ring >> 2peat collusion

[annbafan]

3peat is more memorable

[stalkerforlife]

In what world is less rings better than more, considering these circumstances?