-
King James
Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Just saw a poll on ESPN and fans (51%)believe feel Duncan winning a 5th championship would be more impressive than a LeBron 3 peat.
Thoughts...
-
Bad Username
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
-
2Willd & 2Fresh est.86
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Lebron earned none of his ringz.
-
Banned
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
a 3peat an 5 rings is more impressive
-
Local High School Star
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
its all about context
so in this case, duncan vs lebron/wade/bosh, id give it to duncan for that longevity while still being a key contributor in the teams success.
-
Decent college freshman
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
5 rings are more impressive if there are no context involved.
Lebron getting a 3-peat is more important and more impressive than Duncan getting 5 rings over the course of 16 years.
-
Bad Username
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Peak vs. Longevity. I'll take peak(3-peating)
But tell me this: Is a sidekick ring better than an NBA MVP?
-
NBA Legend
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
It depends on the role he plays during the title runs. Sidekick 3-peat means very little, and 7 rings means nothing if you are a role player.
-
Buck Dynasty
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Originally Posted by Rocketswin2013
Peak vs. Longevity. I'll take peak(3-peating)
But tell me this: Is a sidekick ring better than an NBA MVP?
Depends on context. How good was the #1, how good was the sidekick, and how did they both perform in the playoffs?
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
One does not simply become more impressive with three collusion rings over 5 legitimate rings.
-
2Willd & 2Fresh est.86
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Originally Posted by kamil
One does not simply become more impressive with three collusion rings over 4 legitimate rings.
fixed
-
College star
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
3peat over 10 years > 5 rings over 16 years
-
Banned
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Originally Posted by Solefade
3peat over 10 years > 5 rings over 16 years
anything is better than collusion rings.
04 pistons ring >> 2peat collusion
-
I usually hit open layups
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
Last edited by annbafan; 06-03-2014 at 03:28 PM.
-
Free the banned users.
Re: Are 5 Rings More Impressive Than a 3 peat?
In what world is less rings better than more, considering these circumstances?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|