Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,888

    Default Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Lakers send: Steve Nash, Jodie Meeks
    Lakers receive: Bynum (expirer)

    Cavs send: Bynum (expirer)
    Cavs receive: Steve Nash, Jodie Meeks

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    I rule the local playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    503

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Cavs are basically only getting one player.

  3. #3
    Local High School Star 3peated's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,293

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    thoughts: you are a clueless basketball 'fan'
    thoughts: this helps no one
    thoughts: this hurts both sides
    thoughts: im really mad at a post you made on the internet

  4. #4
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,888

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by PizzamanIRL
    Cavs are basically only getting one player.
    Lakers are basically only getting zero players.

  5. #5
    I rule the local playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    503

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by BallsOut
    Lakers are basically only getting zero players.
    Then why are you proposing this retarded trade?

  6. #6
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,888

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by PizzamanIRL
    Then why are you proposing this retarded trade?
    It's not retarded. The Cavs get a good player they can use. The Lakers get an expirer. It works out for both teams.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,637

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    How fast these laker stans forget how much they hated him and wanted him traded. You hated him because he was always injured, he still is. You hated his immaturity playing bowling and carrying girls on his shoulders when he was 'recovering'. Traded him for Howard then you found out how 'immature' he was too when you were losing.

    Now they want this immature injury prone guy back. What makes you think he wants to play with Kobe if he can't get over Irving's ballhogging ways? You're nuts if you think Kobe will ballhog less than Irving, you're nuts if you think the organization will back up Bynum over Kobe when he just signed that ridiculous extension.

  8. #8
    I am your soldier!
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In the year 2525
    Posts
    6,611

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by BallsOut
    It's not retarded. The Cavs get a good player they can use. The Lakers get an expirer. It works out for both teams.
    How can they use Meeks when they have Irving, Waiters, and Jack?

  9. #9
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,888

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by ProfessorMurder
    How can they use Meeks when they have Irving, Waiters, and Jack?
    Irving and Jack are PGs. Waiters is their only true SG. Meeks can shoot the 3 ball lights out, something they lack.

  10. #10
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    6,888

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by ispin69
    How fast these laker stans forget how much they hated him and wanted him traded. You hated him because he was always injured, he still is. You hated his immaturity playing bowling and carrying girls on his shoulders when he was 'recovering'. Traded him for Howard then you found out how 'immature' he was too when you were losing.

    Now they want this immature injury prone guy back. What makes you think he wants to play with Kobe if he can't get over Irving's ballhogging ways? You're nuts if you think Kobe will ballhog less than Irving, you're nuts if you think the organization will back up Bynum over Kobe when he just signed that ridiculous extension.
    Bynum is an expirer. Lakers wouldn't expect much out of him. Just let him expire. You seem awfully upset.

  11. #11
    Decent college freshman Mass Debator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,792

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    This is actually plausible.

  12. #12
    I rule the local playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    503

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by BallsOut
    Meeks can shoot the 3 ball lights out, something they lack.
    Em, hello? Anthony Bennett! 3 ball king.

  13. #13
    The Paterfamilias RedBlackAttack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The "Q"
    Posts
    25,359

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by BallsOut
    Lakers send: Steve Nash, Jodie Meeks
    Lakers receive: Bynum (expirer)

    Cavs send: Bynum (expirer)
    Cavs receive: Steve Nash, Jodie Meeks

    Thoughts?
    I like it. Nash is pretty much done as a major player in this league, but he could help out a lot as a steady veteran presence in the lockerroom, especially with our two young dynamic guards. Meeks would provide some shooting, which the Cavs desperately need.

    Our only veterans currently in the rotation are Varejao (who speaks very broken English), Jack and Miles. Those guys aren't exactly known for their leadership qualities.

    I think I'd do it.

  14. #14
    I rep Lakers!
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2,734

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Lakers need a 1st round pick

  15. #15
    The Paterfamilias RedBlackAttack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The "Q"
    Posts
    25,359

    Default Re: Lakers and Cavs Trade Scenario

    Quote Originally Posted by WeGetRing2012
    Lakers need a 1st round pick
    They aren't getting it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •