Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53
  1. #1
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,167

    Default Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Would Nash be an even better fit next to Durant?

    Nash would thrive even more in todays league than he did then...true or false?

  2. #2
    Titles are overrated Kblaze8855's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    I love me some me.
    Posts
    32,956

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Nash would thrive even more but that wouldnt make the Warriors better. They could win the title with either so im not sure the difference would be noteworthy.

    I wonder if a coach could convince Nash to actually try to score these days. Some people just arent built that way.

    You know he had 25-28 a game talent even if he didnt use it.

  3. #3
    Banned 305Baller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,878

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Hmmm... thats an interesting question.

    Nash's 3 point percentage would have to factor into any debate

  4. #4
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,167

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
    Nash would thrive even more but that wouldnt make the Warriors better. They could win the title with either so im not sure the difference would be noteworthy.

    I wonder if a coach could convince Nash to actually try to score these days. Some people just arent built that way.

    You know he had 25-28 a game talent even if he didnt use it.
    Nash turned up his scoring a bit in the playoffs:

    https://www.basketball-reference.com.../nashst01.html

  5. #5
    Lol RRR3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    47,645

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kblaze8855
    Nash would thrive even more but that wouldnt make the Warriors better. They could win the title with either so im not sure the difference would be noteworthy.

    I wonder if a coach could convince Nash to actually try to score these days. Some people just arent built that way.

    You know he had 25-28 a game talent even if he didnt use it.
    That always bothered me with CP3. There was no reason for CP3 not to be scoring 25 PPG if you ask me.

  6. #6
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,920

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Nash's stats would be insane in today's game, but he was a ball-dominator like harden or Westbrook

    So if he played like that, the Warriors wouldn't be as good

    however, he has catch-and-shoot ability like Curry, so he could succeed with the Warriors by simply adjusting his game

  7. #7
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,167

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by RRR3
    That always bothered me with CP3. There was no reason for CP3 not to be scoring 25 PPG if you ask me.
    Yeah there is...he's a point guard. His job is to be the engine and make the TEAM score.

    PG looking out for his own offense(short of the team having a lot of talent like Curry who plays more like a shooting guard) isn't good for the team.

  8. #8
    Banned 305Baller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,878

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    from 2004 to 2010 Nash has a case.

    according to the numbers.

  9. #9
    Banned 305Baller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,878

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    lucky 7s

    Wildcard.


    Endgame.


    HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHHAH

  10. #10
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,609

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Curry's much better at creating for himself on the perimeter. Though Nash might've been more deadly once in the paint. I would think Curry's a bit better finisher but Nash could really manipulate a defense once in there. Overall the Warriors would be worse despite Nash being the better passer. Curry's scoring is much better.

  11. #11
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,167

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ball
    Nash's stats would be insane in today's game, but he was a ball-dominator like harden or Westbrook

    So if he played like that, the Warriors wouldn't be as good

    however, he has catch-and-shoot ability like Curry, so he could succeed with the Warriors by simply adjusting his game
    When you put it that way...Nash might also be better for Klay who doesn't get many opportunities since Durant joined.

  12. #12
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,920

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Draymond becomes a spot-up shooter if Nash plays his normal style

    Otoh, Draymond is currently a playmaker because Curry is a spot-up shooter... Curry's style allows teammates like Dray and Durant to play to full capacity as part-time ball-handlers

    So while curry doesn't actively get teammates shots as much as Nash, his style allows for more sophisticated and diverse offense, and a better team overall

    Nash does have the capacity to adjust and play more like curry though. I don't think we'd see much drop-off with Nash vs curry

  13. #13
    Top 10. hold this L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    10,146

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by 3ball
    Draymond becomes a spot-up shooter if Nash plays his normal style

    Otoh, Draymond is currently a playmaker because Curry is a spot-up shooter... Curry's style allows teammates like Dray and Durant to play to full capacity as part-time ball-handlers

    So while curry doesn't actively get teammates shots as much as Nash, his style allows for more sophisticated and diverse offense, and a better team overall

    Nash does have the capacity to adjust and play more like curry though. I don't think we'd see much drop-off with Nash vs curry
    God you are a ****ing moron.

  14. #14
    Banned SpaceJam2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    6,179

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by hold this L
    God you are a ****ing moron.

  15. #15
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,920

    Default Re: Would the Warriors be any worse with Prime Nash instead of Curry?

    Quote Originally Posted by hold this L
    God you are a ****ing moron.
    He isn't just a spot up shooter dumbass

    But it's a big part of his game

    However, I wouldn't expect you to see thru the obvious lines there

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •