Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456
Results 76 to 78 of 78
  1. #76
    Good High School Starter dreamwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    959

    Default Re: Coach K on the Wiggins-for-Love "Would do it without a moment of hesitance."

    Honestly I'd do it too. Wiggins is unproven and I'm no longer convinced that his ceiling is higher than Love, and Bennett I don't think is going to pan out while Love is a sure thing.

  2. #77
    The Paterfamilias RedBlackAttack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    The "Q"
    Posts
    25,359

    Default Re: Coach K on the Wiggins-for-Love "Would do it without a moment of hesitance."

    This thread is just a disaster. Wiggins is unproven, eh? He's a f#cking 19-year-old rookie? When was the last rookie that was "proven"? And, again... Golden State's other best offer is David Lee and Harrison Barnes. We should certainly have to hand over Wiggins, though, just "because"....

    Did I mention that Love will not be signing an extension and we'll have to rely on re-signing him via free agency next year, as well? Yes? Well, I just mentioned it again in case you didn't catch it the first time.

    If Wiggins is included in this trade, it will have been a massive debacle of epic proportions.

    I know Minnesota really, really, really wants him. I get that... I do. I also know that LeBron fans couldn't care less about this franchise beyond the next few years. Why should they?

    But there is a reason almost every Cavs fan is against including Wiggins in a trade... any trade.

  3. #78
    History made 2016 El Gato Negro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Rent free in the land
    Posts
    1,008

    Default Re: Coach K on the Wiggins-for-Love "Would do it without a moment of hesitance."

    Quote Originally Posted by RedBlackAttack
    This thread is just a disaster. Wiggins is unproven, eh? He's a f#cking 19-year-old rookie? When was the last rookie that was "proven"? And, again... Golden State's other best offer is David Lee and Harrison Barnes. We should certainly have to hand over Wiggins, though, just "because"....

    Did I mention that Love will not be signing an extension and we'll have to rely on re-signing him via free agency next year, as well? Yes? Well, I just mentioned it again in case you didn't catch it the first time.

    If Wiggins is included in this trade, it will have been a massive debacle of epic proportions.

    I know Minnesota really, really, really wants him. I get that... I do. I also know that LeBron fans couldn't care less about this franchise beyond the next few years. Why should they?

    But there is a reason almost every Cavs fan is against including Wiggins in a trade... any trade.
    Well good thing for cavs fans griff and gil have both said repeatedly wiggins isn't going to be traded. wolves can keep dreaming tho.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •