-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Teams figured out how to defend Portland halfway trough the season. Only Houston are so bad defensively it didn't matter
-
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by Dresta
Nah, Houston did just suck. Can't believe some people actually thought they were potential contenders
Only Rockets trolls thought that.
-
National High School Star
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
I dont agree that Houston is bad. they didnt match up well with Portland. Portland has alot of good one on one defenders. Their team defense is not that great. Houston was playing iso ball which portland was quick to defend. Now against san antonio their team defense is being exposed. not to mention that stotts completely outcoached mchale and is not getting schooled by Pop.
-
Moderator
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by kurple
Lack of bench my ass
Huh? Their bench is terrible. Spurs bench just has destroyed them.
-
Buck Dynasty
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
No shit.
Houston sucks ass, period.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by Knicks2014champ
When u have Dwight coward on your team you deserve everything that comes to you that loser will never win anything
Dwight was the best player in that series...
-
NBA Legend
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Portland had a better PG and PF.
Houston had a better SG and C.
SFs were even.
But even at the 2 and 5 Portland had Matthews and Lopez. At the 4 Houston had... Jones, for a while, then it went to Asik, who is a liability on offense. So Houston was playing 5 on 4 through the first 5 games on both ends of the floor.
Ahh well, youngest team in the league? They've got about 3 years to figure it out.
-
Buck Dynasty
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by UK2K
Dwight was the best player in that series...
Dwight was terrific that series and I don't want to criticize him any way...but you could definitely make the case that Aldridge was better. Same for Lillard.
Aldridge put up 30/11/2/3/1 on 48/67/82 shooting...and that's including his 8 point performance in game 5. Lillard put up 26/6/7/1 on 47/49/88 shooting.
Lillard has less of a case considering Dwight's defensive impact, but Aldridge definitely has a strong one.
-
Decent college freshman
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Wonder what Mavs Blazers would've looked like
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by InfiniteBaskets
Wonder what Mavs Blazers would've looked like
Lillard would have raped them, but Dallas would still win. Portland really isn't that good though. This is as good as they are going to get. Houston is just terrible though I guess.
-
Moderator
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
Lillard would have raped them, but Dallas would still win. Portland really isn't that good though. This is as good as they are going to get. Houston is just terrible though I guess.
Actually Portland are only going to get better I imagine. Depends who they can pick up this summer.
-
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
4-0 in the regular season.
We da bess, yall mad.
-
Good college starter
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Houston just has no heart, no identity, and no D.
They are a team with good pieces, but no ****ing clue what to do with them.
And McHale is just awful...can't believe everyone is losing their jobs except this clueless ****.
-
Child, please
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Coaching becomes so important in the playoffs. McHale got outcoached badly by Stotts in the first round, but now that coaching advantage for Portland has been flipped completely around facing Pop.
-
Re: Houston Must Be Pretty Bad If They Lost to Portland
Originally Posted by UK2K
Portland had a better PG and PF.
Houston had a better SG and C.
SFs were even.
But even at the 2 and 5 Portland had Matthews and Lopez. At the 4 Houston had... Jones, for a while, then it went to Asik, who is a liability on offense. So Houston was playing 5 on 4 through the first 5 games on both ends of the floor.
Ahh well, youngest team in the league? They've got about 3 years to figure it out.
Portland also had the better SG
i agree Lillard>Bevershit aka the fake ill guy
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|