Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39
  1. #16
    <3 LeBron <3 Heat <3 The Choken One's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,570

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Quote Originally Posted by imnew09
    Point guard wise I would take Kyrie, Rubio, Cp3,Rondo
    You classify Curry as a PG or SG? Just wondering. I know a few of my friends consider him a SG.

  2. #17
    Wait and See lilgodfather1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5,105

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Other than the super obvious i'd take Kyrie, Drummond, Cousins, Davis, and Westbrook over him.

    In fact I think i'd take any very good big man over Lillard. Not a knock on him, but PG's do not win NBA titles as the best player, and aside from two outliers (Magic, Isiah) I don't think they ever will. A great PG needs a great big man to win, where as a great big man can win with good PGs.

  3. #18
    2010-2020 AirTupac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    17,472

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    LeBron
    Durant
    CP3
    Howard
    Paul George
    Irving
    Curry

  4. #19
    Not airballing my layups anymore
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    120

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    I'd take Drummond.

  5. #20
    Banned liquidrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    993

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    At 22 Rose was 25 7 and 4 on .440 and Westbrook was 22 8 and 4 on .440

    Lillard is 19 6 and 4 on .430

    Obviously 1st year in the league so he has some getting used to. But I don't think he's going to go up a ton. Rose's 1st year when he was 19 compares favorably to Lillard's while Westbrook's first year (again at 19) was slightly less but his second year at age 20 was better than Lillard's current year.

    In conclusion, I think the OP is raving mad.

  6. #21
    Serious playground baller Nezty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    466

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Ohh boy.
    Motiejunas, Harden, Rubio, Marc, P.George,Curry...

    Your man crush would bring your franchise down and get you fired, 10.5 mpg.

  7. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    592

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    "Irving is good, could be great, but he gets injured every week and IMO his kind of game (horizontal movements, contested jumpers after many dribbles) isn't as successful as Lillard's."

    Irving is a better slasher and finisher than Lillard, not to mention 2-3 years younger. You should have just stop talking after your injury line.

    It's much more of a stretch to say you'd only take 3 guys going forward over Lillard in the entire NBA than you'd take three guys going forward other than him in his draft class.

  8. #23
    Sixers|Eagles|Phillies GOBB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Illadelph live 215
    Posts
    44,671

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Quote Originally Posted by Clifton
    Say if I could have any player for a 6 year Max deal. The only guys I'd take over Lillard would be the obvious ones: Lebron, Durant, and Chris Paul.

  9. #24
    I usually hit open layups
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Murfreesboro
    Posts
    157

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Choken One
    I'd take Steph Curry. Just saiyan...
    Put away Curry's injury history, I would take him. Lillard is top 10 PG his first year in the league. Lillard's power level is over 9000!!!, thats the super saiyan these days...

  10. #25
    Knicks all da way imdaman99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    26,428

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    i like the kid, hes already hit a few game winners? but you're blowin smoke up his behind

  11. #26
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,670

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    I live in Portland and think the OP's nuts. He's 22, how much room does he really have to grow? He's a nice player, probably will make a few allstar teams, but I'd be shocked if he was ever a superstar.

  12. #27
    Kobe= 1st round loser secund2nun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Lillard is massively overrated. I would take many young players over him.

  13. #28
    5-time NBA All-Star G-train's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,316

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    This will be Lillard's best season.

    And he is a terrible defender.

    Good player, but I would take many players ahead of him for next 6 seasons.

    Anthony Davis, MKR, Drummond from this draft alone I would consider.

    Harden and Westbrook definitely.

    Griffin, George, Irving definitely. Many others too.

    Dwight Howard definitely.

  14. #29
    new based god MetsPackers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,752

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Quote Originally Posted by CeltsGarlic
    Ohh boy.
    Motiejunas, Harden, Rubio, Marc, P.George,Curry...

    Really dude? You'd sign freaking Motiejunas to a MAX deal before you signed Lillard. I realize dude is from your country and everything but Motiejunas isn't qualified to sniff Lillard's jockstrap. He's OK at best, will possibly be a decent role player big man, but I also wouldn't be shocked if he wasn't in the NBA in 6 years either

  15. #30
    talk less, say more Clifton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,939

    Default Re: There are only 3 guys I'd take over Damian Lillard.

    Not a knock on him, but PG's do not win NBA titles as the best player, and aside from two outliers (Magic, Isiah) I don't think they ever will.
    This is the post-big man era. In this era Chauncey Billups has a Finals MVP. In 2007 Parker won Finals MVP, not Duncan, and if they win again this year (likely), he'll win another. Kobe won the FMVP for his last 2 titles. The two best teams in the league currently have no back to the basket player on offense and no elite paint presence on defense either.

    Obviously he needs a well-rounded roster to win a title, but would anyone. He does not however need a great big man to carry him to one, because *those don't exist anymore*.

    And for those of you saying Drummond............................... I don't know what to say to that. You're reaching. Being desperate for a big man prospect has been the number one draft fallacy in the last ten years. Remember that guy drafted above Jordan? Wade? Durant? Not that Lill is any of these guys but when when the better player also has more impact and more leadership, you go with the better player....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •