-
ruckus for president
-
College star
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
-
ruckus for president
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by Knicksfever2010
son i've probably been a fan since before you were born, there ain't nothing left but laughing at the jimmy dolan circus: spree->houston->starbury->curry->lee->melo->hardaway jr.
-
The People's Choice
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
That man David Lee was the only real leader we ever had
-
ruckus for president
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by Draz
That man David Lee was the only real leader we ever had
-
NBA Finals MVP
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Jackson should've ditched Melo last offseason and gone full re-build. He's a bad luck charm.
-
I Run NY.
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
What were you trading JR Smith for? Cleveland would only take him if we threw in Shumpert. You can't complain we traded him for nothing, because no one was taking his $8M a year AND throwing in something to pay for the privlege.
People keep saying that, teams don't walk up and take expensive problematic assets for nothing. Unless OP didn't want the extra $8M in cap room next year.
-
ruckus for president
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by niko
What were you trading JR Smith for? Cleveland would only take him if we threw in Shumpert. You can't complain we traded him for nothing, because no one was taking his $8M a year AND throwing in something to pay for the privlege.
People keep saying that, teams don't walk up and take expensive problematic assets for nothing. Unless OP didn't want the extra $8M in cap room next year.
how about first looking for a team that had trade assets and was in a dire need for spacing. Like chicago, grizzlies, pelicans, phonix, raptors or bucks.
These are all teams who had the assets and the need to really take a serious look at jr, it's not like he was a scrub, just misused.
-
ruckus for president
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Shit, for 8m AND schumpert it would've been better to just keep him till the summer and let him chuck like nuts. Trade him when his stock would be at least decent, to a dumbass GM like khan or that indian cuck. We got zero out of it, and it's not like NY don't have money to spend.
-
College superstar
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by swagga
how about first looking for a team that had trade assets and was in a dire need for spacing. Like chicago, grizzlies, pelicans, phonix, raptors or bucks.
These are all teams who had the assets and the need to really take a serious look at jr, it's not like he was a scrub, just misused.
JR's stock was at an all time low. I can show you posts by same people who call JR as great now shitting on him during the trade and knicks fans being happy that cancer is off the team.
People kept questioning shumpert's health and desire. you could have gotten something better for shumpert but not for JR. you had to undersell shumpert to get rid of JR.
Last edited by Rose'sACL; 05-21-2015 at 03:09 PM.
-
ruckus for president
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by Rose'sACL
JR's stock was at an all time low. I can show you posts by same people who call JR as great now shitting on him during the trade and knicks fans being happy that cancer is off the team.
Originally Posted by swagga
Shit, for 8m AND schumpert it would've been better to just keep him till the summer and let him chuck like nuts. Trade him when his stock would be at least decent, to a dumbass GM like khan or that indian cuck. We got zero out of it, and it's not like NY don't have money to spend.
i know.
-
I Run NY.
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by swagga
Shit, for 8m AND schumpert it would've been better to just keep him till the summer and let him chuck like nuts. Trade him when his stock would be at least decent, to a dumbass GM like khan or that indian cuck. We got zero out of it, and it's not like NY don't have money to spend.
Then we wouldn't have had cap space. And Shump is a free agent. It's easy to say "We should have got more", it would have been near impossible to get more.
Somehow, coming off the tank and not playing with Lebron (we'd have a worse draft pick too, would that be ok?) JR Smith would have so much value someone would not only take his salary but pay us to do it.
That's not realistic.
-
I Run NY.
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by swagga
how about first looking for a team that had trade assets and was in a dire need for spacing. Like chicago, grizzlies, pelicans, phonix, raptors or bucks.
These are all teams who had the assets and the need to really take a serious look at jr, it's not like he was a scrub, just misused.
Except for Milwaukee none of those teams would have taken on his salary for next year. And Toronto and Milwaukee didn't need $8M swingmen coming off the bench.
It's easy to complain, but the only way to dump his salary was to throw in an asset. I want his salary gone. You can't say you want it gone AND you want something in return, that's not possible.
People always want these magical ****ing trades where there team benefits huge and other team loses.
-
Ringsssss
-
Re: knicks year in review 10/10
Originally Posted by Optimus Prime
Knicks (inadvertently because they suck) tank for a Top 3 pick in a 3 player draft.
Get the 4th pick.
The New York Knickerbockers!
It's a 4 player draft...
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|