So Bran is the best player

[knicksman]

yet pierce's big 3 is better despite a lesser player. I really cant understand this logic. Are bran stans really these genius that I cant reach their level of analysis or the other way around?

[CavaliersFTW]

what?

[Prometheus]

yet pierce's big 3 is better despite a lesser player. I really cant understand this logic. Are bran stans really these genius that I cant reach their level of analysis or the other way around?

Pierce wasn't even the best player in his "big three". You lose.

[Cocaine80s]

what?

op has aspergers.

please ignore

[Prometheus]

yet pierce's big 3 is better despite a lesser player. I really cant understand this logic. Are bran stans really these genius that I cant reach their level of analysis or the other way around?

I really cant understand

I really cant understand

Pretty much sums up knicksman's entire ISH career.

[knicksman]

Pierce wasn't even the best player in his "big three". You lose.

2 top 5 vs 1 top 5. So if garnett is as good as wade(both top 5) then we should compare pierce to bran. And thats not even considering bosh being better than allen.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

How was Pierce's big 3 more successful (or "better") than Miami's? 2 championships and 4 finals appearances > 1 championship and 2 finals appearances.

At least that's what I think you were implying. Your post is all over the place.

[navy]

The Heat big 3 was better than the Celtics Big 3

Lebron > Pierce
Wade > Allen
Garnett > Bosh

4 Finals Appearances vs 2
2 Titles vs 1
2-0 head to head record in the post season

[JohnFreeman]

[knicksman]

How were Pierce's big 3 more successful (or "better) than Miami's? 2 championships and 4 finals appearances > 1 championship and 2 finals appearances.

I fear bostons big 3 more. And thats because they were at the twilight of their prime. While miami just entered their prime. And thats not even considering the ring that shouldve been theirs if not for the refs.

[Milbuck]

[knicksman]

The Heat big 3 was better than the Celtics Big 3

Lebron > Pierce
Wade > Allen
Garnett > Bosh

4 Finals Appearances vs 2
2 Titles vs 1
2-0 head to head record in the post season

They shouldve won 2 if not for the refs and 3 if not for the stupid perkins trade. But even still way past their prime needed the refs against them when they faced a prime miami

[Prometheus]

2 top 5 vs 1 top 5. So if garnett is as good as wade(both top 5) then we should compare pierce to bran. And thats not even considering bosh being better than allen.

Obviously we should compare Wade/Allen, LeBron/Pierce, and Garnett/Bosh since they each play the position of their counterpart...

Wade was a far more dominant and dynamic player than Allen in his prime, but his decline was steep and severe... by the 2014 Finals, Wade was a significantly less impactful player than Allen during Boston's run... not to mention that Allen fit with his teammates much better, being a great catch and shoot player who moves off the ball with the greatest of all time. Wade and LeBron had similar games, so they complemented each other to a lesser degree...

LeBron is way better than Pierce. In every way. So there's that.

Garnett is way better than Bosh. In every way (except threes the last few years... but the fact that Bosh chooses that so much diminishes his impact in ways as well). So there's that.

But let's address your point in the first place:

How were Pierce's big 3 more successful (or "better) than Miami's? 2 championships and 4 finals appearances > 1 championship and 2 finals appearances.

That pretty well sums it up, eh?

[knicksman]

Just shows bran stans really have no idea about basketball besides stats if they believe miami big 3 is better than bostons. LOL

[JohnFreeman]

Just shows bran stans really have no idea about basketball besides stats if they believe miami big 3 is better than bostons. LOL