Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 151
  1. #16
    Do. Your. Job. Undisputed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    6,577

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    It doesn't get any clearer than that. Those officials called this game for Boston all night long. The NBA officials are so pathetic. It's makes me sick watching a game like that.

  2. #17
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobe24
    Have they ever called a technical on a foul? It's either Flagrant or regular foul. Smarten up.

    They have, you just haven't been watching basketball long enough.

  3. #18
    Good college starter Kevin_Garnett_5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,200

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by Undisputed
    It doesn't get any clearer than that. Those officials called this game for Boston all night long. The NBA officials are so pathetic and disgusting.
    Did you see the fouls they were calling on Ray Allen?

  4. #19
    Intelligent fan
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Land of 14 NBA Championships
    Posts
    4,872

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    They have, you just haven't been watching basketball long enough.
    Examples.

    * Awaits*

  5. #20
    NBA rookie of the year 04mzwach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,929

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by burnsy87
    I bet you were saying the same thing when the bulls were down by 3 in the first OT Sunday... How can you just say "they were going to win". The bulls played flat last time and came out in the 2nd OT firing.
    Paul looked slow and was still hitting daggers in the 4th and OT. What Paul was doing wasn't even that great. The Bulls defense was broke and giving Paul way too much respect. Paul's last shot was kind of like "Oh, you're just going to let me take this? Are you scared to touch me or something? OK! SWIISHH." It was kind of funny.

  6. #21
    NJ Net Fan For Life. wang4three's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    11,773

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kobe24
    Examples.

    * Awaits*
    The only play I can see you making is the following:

    "they wouldn't call the technical because it was late in the game and they did not want to decide the game".

    Otherwise, you're just embarrassing yourself. So I'll give you the time to go ahead and copy and paste my quote.

  7. #22
    GiveItToBurrito
    Fan in the Stands (unregistered)

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    I think that if Rondo were six inches taller, it might have been flagrant. That said, it seemed more like a desperate attempt to hit the ball than a real attempt at hitting Miller.

  8. #23
    Intelligent fan
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Land of 14 NBA Championships
    Posts
    4,872

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by wang4three
    The only play I can see you making is the following:

    "they wouldn't call the technical because it was late in the game and they did not want to decide the game".

    Otherwise, you're just embarrassing yourself. So I'll give you the time to go ahead and copy and paste my quote.
    Riiiiiight


    You write a lot to say I don't have any examples because it has never happened. Typical case of an idiot talking out his ass.

  9. #24
    College superstar Allstar24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Posts
    4,494

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    It doesn't matter. Even if they made the technical free throw, Miller is a choker and he would miss both his free throws anyway. So they'd end up losing by one rather than two points.

  10. #25
    Very good NBA starter ConanRulesNBC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    8,198

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    He got slapped right across the face by Rondo. It was definitely a flagrant.

    The Bulls need to quit being pu**ies out there and start knocking the Celtics on their asses.

  11. #26
    Good High School Starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    848

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin_Garnett_5
    Did you see the fouls they were calling on Ray Allen?
    Did you see the phantom fouls on Davis' and 1's? Did you see how everytime Rondo touched the ball there was a foul called? Did you see Rose get his ARM blocked on a layup and there was a no call? At least Allens were "technically" fouls. These blown calls were blatant.

    This was the last play of the game. For the win or the loss or the tie. I guarantee you that Rondo could have undercut miler, then kicked him in the face and there would have been a no call.

  12. #27
    Saw a basketball once
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    4

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    that was terrible. if i were miller, i woulda slapped rondo after the game. screw little-boy lookin rondouche and screw the celt-*****.

  13. #28
    7-time NBA All-Star OneMoreSucka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    12,124

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by 04mzwach
    Paul looked slow and was still hitting daggers in the 4th and OT. What Paul was doing wasn't even that great. The Bulls defense was broke and giving Paul way too much respect. Paul's last shot was kind of like "Oh, you're just going to let me take this? Are you scared to touch me or something? OK! SWIISHH." It was kind of funny.
    Too much respect? If anything they weren't showing him ANY by actualing thinking they could check him with single coverage. Why Noah didn't double when he was behind the 3 point line in beyond me. You're better than that, Del Negro.

  14. #29
    GiveItToBurrito
    Fan in the Stands (unregistered)

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    Quote Originally Posted by Allstar24
    It doesn't matter. Even if they made the technical free throw, Miller is a choker and he would miss both his free throws anyway. So they'd end up losing by one rather than two points.
    I kind of agree. Miller missing the shot was somewhat understandable, though, since he had a mouth full of blood.

  15. #30
    We want Tacos! Babalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,172

    Default Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?

    should have been a technical. He got all head and knocked a tooth out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •