-
Do. Your. Job.
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
It doesn't get any clearer than that. Those officials called this game for Boston all night long. The NBA officials are so pathetic. It's makes me sick watching a game like that.
-
NJ Net Fan For Life.
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by Kobe24
Have they ever called a technical on a foul? It's either Flagrant or regular foul. Smarten up.
They have, you just haven't been watching basketball long enough.
-
Good college starter
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
-
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by wang4three
They have, you just haven't been watching basketball long enough.
Examples.
* Awaits*
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by burnsy87
I bet you were saying the same thing when the bulls were down by 3 in the first OT Sunday... How can you just say "they were going to win". The bulls played flat last time and came out in the 2nd OT firing.
Paul looked slow and was still hitting daggers in the 4th and OT. What Paul was doing wasn't even that great. The Bulls defense was broke and giving Paul way too much respect. Paul's last shot was kind of like "Oh, you're just going to let me take this? Are you scared to touch me or something? OK! SWIISHH." It was kind of funny.
-
NJ Net Fan For Life.
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by Kobe24
Examples.
* Awaits*
The only play I can see you making is the following:
"they wouldn't call the technical because it was late in the game and they did not want to decide the game".
Otherwise, you're just embarrassing yourself. So I'll give you the time to go ahead and copy and paste my quote.
-
GiveItToBurrito
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
I think that if Rondo were six inches taller, it might have been flagrant. That said, it seemed more like a desperate attempt to hit the ball than a real attempt at hitting Miller.
-
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by wang4three
The only play I can see you making is the following:
"they wouldn't call the technical because it was late in the game and they did not want to decide the game".
Otherwise, you're just embarrassing yourself. So I'll give you the time to go ahead and copy and paste my quote.
Riiiiiight
You write a lot to say I don't have any examples because it has never happened. Typical case of an idiot talking out his ass.
-
College superstar
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
It doesn't matter. Even if they made the technical free throw, Miller is a choker and he would miss both his free throws anyway. So they'd end up losing by one rather than two points.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
He got slapped right across the face by Rondo. It was definitely a flagrant.
The Bulls need to quit being pu**ies out there and start knocking the Celtics on their asses.
-
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by Kevin_Garnett_5
Did you see the phantom fouls on Davis' and 1's? Did you see how everytime Rondo touched the ball there was a foul called? Did you see Rose get his ARM blocked on a layup and there was a no call? At least Allens were "technically" fouls. These blown calls were blatant.
This was the last play of the game. For the win or the loss or the tie. I guarantee you that Rondo could have undercut miler, then kicked him in the face and there would have been a no call.
-
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
that was terrible. if i were miller, i woulda slapped rondo after the game. screw little-boy lookin rondouche and screw the celt-*****.
-
7-time NBA All-Star
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by 04mzwach
Paul looked slow and was still hitting daggers in the 4th and OT. What Paul was doing wasn't even that great. The Bulls defense was broke and giving Paul way too much respect. Paul's last shot was kind of like "Oh, you're just going to let me take this? Are you scared to touch me or something? OK! SWIISHH." It was kind of funny.
Too much respect? If anything they weren't showing him ANY by actualing thinking they could check him with single coverage. Why Noah didn't double when he was behind the 3 point line in beyond me. You're better than that, Del Negro.
-
GiveItToBurrito
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
Originally Posted by Allstar24
It doesn't matter. Even if they made the technical free throw, Miller is a choker and he would miss both his free throws anyway. So they'd end up losing by one rather than two points.
I kind of agree. Miller missing the shot was somewhat understandable, though, since he had a mouth full of blood.
-
We want Tacos!
Re: Should Rondo's foul on Miller have been flagrant?
should have been a technical. He got all head and knocked a tooth out.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|