-
lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
both greatly underachived
malone was a product of stockton
barkley was a fat lazy no defense playing bad team mate
both had stacked rosters throughout their careers
both had plenty of chances to win. and both should have won
barkley had dr j and moses
barkley had kevin johnson and majerle
barkley had hakeem and drexler
malone had arguably the greatest pure PG of all time his entire career almost
malone even bandwaggoned with the lakers and messed that up
the fact of the matter is. Kevin Garnett is the 2nd best power forward ever
if i had to choose between those 3.. kg is an easy choice
he changes the culture of a franchise. he holds people accountable. he is the best defensive player in the league and as #1 option could give me 20ppg and 4-5 assists
hes a winner. and doesnt depend on a PG to score. nore is he lazy and overweight
more all nba teams, more all defensive teams, more titles, same mvp's
better player
-
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
both greatly underachived
malone was a product of stockton
barkley was a fat lazy no defense playing bad team mate
both had stacked rosters throughout their careers
both had plenty of chances to win. and both should have won
barkley had dr j and moses
barkley had kevin johnson and majerle
barkley had hakeem and drexler
malone had arguably the greatest pure PG of all time his entire career almost
malone even bandwaggoned with the lakers and messed that up
the fact of the matter is. Kevin Garnett is the 2nd best power forward ever
if i had to choose between those 3.. kg is an easy choice
he changes the culture of a franchise. he holds people accountable. he is the best defensive player in the league and as #1 option could give me 20ppg and 4-5 assists
hes a winner. and doesnt depend on a PG to score. nore is he lazy and overweight
more all nba teams, more all defensive teams, more titles, same mvp's
better player
wow you actually made a post that makes some sense
-
Coach
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Duncan is a center, so KG is tied for best PF with CB34 and the Mailman
-
Reign of Error
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Originally Posted by SamuraiSWISH
CB34
For some reason I thought you were referring to Chrish Bosh for a second
KG has an argument for 2nd best PF, but I really don't think you can use scoring against Malone in a KG vs Malone comparison... Both Barkley and Malone are clearly better scorers than KG.
-
Big Sexy
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
1 - Tim Duncan
2 - Kevin Garnett
3 - Dirk
4 - Malone
5 - Barkley
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Kobe would have zero rings in MJ era.
-
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
These kobe trolls acting wreckless. You can say the same about Kobe.
Kobe has ZERO rings as ALPHA.
He had the most dominant center in SHAQ.
He had great supporting cast in Derek Fisher, Robert Horry.
Was he able to out shine and outplay Shaq? No.
So what does he do? He gets him traded by threatening to leave.
When he didn't have any Hall of Famers on his team:
1st round bust or NOT EVEN MAKE THE PLAYOFFS AT ALL.
Why didn't he make Kwame Brown, a first round pick better?
Then he gets gifted an allstar in Gasol.
You can EASILY debate that they both shared that ring.
NO ONE was alpha other than Kobe CHUCKING to get more stats padding.
It was equal they were TIED in winning those two.
Kobe always had a STACKED roster with a dominant BIG MAN
while Jordan won Luke Longley as his big man.
Kobe greatly UNDERachieved. He was lazy and the only reason he was first and last to the gym was because there was a female trainer/front office staff member he was trying to rape.
[COLOR="White"]This is the only thing trolls understand. Red me all you want f@gg0ts.[/COLOR]
-
Big Sexy
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Originally Posted by ispin69
while Jordan won Luke Longley as his big man.
Who needs a good big man when you got Scottie 2 Hottie as your wingman.
-
sahelanthropus
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
griff dropping knowledge up in here.
-
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Originally Posted by KyleKong
Who needs a good big man when you got Scottie 2 Hottie as your wingman.
There's a reason BIG men score higher percentage shots, they're closer to the rim. Having Scottie has his second in command only made MJ even greater that he didn't rely on a BIG man. MJ and Pippen created high percentage shots from the post and driving as wingmen.
-
College star
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Imo, when you consider everything:
1. Timmy
2. Malone
3. KG
4. Barkley
5. Dirk
6. Pettit
7. Hayes (underrated af)
8. McHale
Now can I see it any other way? Yes I can. Always hard with these things, and as far as peaks as overall players I wouldn't have the same list.
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
both greatly underachived
malone was a product of stockton
He was great before Stockton was starting.
both had stacked rosters throughout their careers
Jazz weren't stacked outside the big two.
malone even bandwaggoned with the lakers and messed that up
No that would be Kobe that messed that up.
Duncan is more of a center in my mind regardless of what he's been called.
-
Local High School Star
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
1. KG
2. Malone
3. Barkley
4. McHale
5. Dirk
-
The One
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
> Malone was a product of Stockton
>AVG 21.7 pts 10.4 rbs with Stockton playing less than 25 mins per game in 87
Am I wrong here Utah fans?
Last edited by CelticBaller; 10-06-2013 at 04:46 PM.
-
Re: lets be honest.. enough debating between Malone and Barkley. neither are 2nd best PF
This is one of the few post from the OP that I actually don't thoroughly disagree with. But I'd still go with Malone. Malone was a good defender, while also being a sensational scorer(unlike Barkley). Not to mention he was a fitness freak with insane durability.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|