Results 16 to 19 of 19
-
07-27-2016, 05:54 PM #16The Puppeteer
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 15,785
Re: LeBron for Wiggins: which team says no to this trade?
-
07-27-2016, 06:15 PM #17OH! Blocked By James!!
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 1,046
Re: LeBron for Wiggins: which team says no to this trade?
Lebron would carry that team to a ring.
LeBron and KAT. WITH LAVINE, Rubio, Dieng, and Dunn? Oh god mama yes!
-
07-28-2016, 01:27 AM #18National High School Star
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Location
- Toronto
- Posts
- 2,188
Re: LeBron for Wiggins: which team says no to this trade?
People saying the Wolvea would refuse this trade are fking kidding themselves. LeBron on the Wolves instead of Wiggins would instantly make them relevant again. Even if the Wolves don't compete for a chip this year, they'll have a nice duo of Lebron + KAT + capspace to sign other players.
All this without mentioning the extra revenue/hype/winning culture LeBron James brings to the city of Minnesota. You don't even need to think to accept this trade if you were Minnesota. Sure you may not win a championship against SA or GSW with just Lebron, but Lebron is going to give you a good chance - it's not like Wiggins/KAT will guarantee you a championship or anything like that, far from it actually.
-
07-28-2016, 03:47 AM #19The Puppeteer
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Posts
- 15,785
Re: LeBron for Wiggins: which team says no to this trade?
Dude, we are prepping for the future. even if Bran was on the Wolves, we aren't getting past GSW anytime in the foreseeable future.
Originally Posted by Fire Colangelo
makes no sense to trade a 21 year old in this scenario.
It isn't a guarantee at all, but this team is positioned to peak in 3-5 years. The entire NBA landscape could change by then.
Edit: just to clarify for people...LBJ is the best player on the Wolves...but he is built for win now, Wolves are building for the future.
Reply With Quote
