Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36
  1. #1
    3-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    10,694

    Default Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    I have never seen a player as stiff as him becoming a superstar let alone win 5 rings and The guy is a 7 footer yet plays below the rim.

    he also won in a small market. 5 rings is the best for small markets while you have boston, lakers winning 15+ then chicago 6.


    And he won 5 in a more stacked league compared to the watered down 90s
    Last edited by knicksman; 07-29-2016 at 07:28 PM.

  2. #2
    Great college starter feyki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,610

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    He's the greatest since Jordan .

  3. #3
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,793

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    1999 is still part of the 90s and by far the weakest season as far as quality teams. 2003? LOL the early 2000s are even weaker than the 90s. The league wasn't particularly "stacked" as you say in 2005 either for that matter.

  4. #4
    Avengers Assemble! Doctor K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,430

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Smoke117
    1999 is still part of the 90s and by far the weakest season as far as quality teams. 2003? LOL the early 2000s are even weaker than the 90s. The league wasn't particularly "stacked" as you say in 2005 either for that matter.
    bruh he won in 3 different decades and somehow you still are using the when he won against him

  5. #5
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Smoke117's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    26,793

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor K
    bruh he won in 3 different decades and somehow you still are using the when he won against him
    I'm not using anything against him...this dumb ass knicksman is trying to say that when Duncan was winning his rings the league was stacked compared to the 90s...that's just not true for most of the Spurs championships. The league wasn't any better in 99 and 2003 than it was in the rest of the 90s...definitely weaker compared to the early 90s.

  6. #6
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,687

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by feyki
    He's the greatest since Jordan .
    Greatest what since Jordan what?


    .

  7. #7
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,687

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by knicksman
    I have never seen a player as stiff as him becoming a superstar let alone win 5 rings and The guy is a 7 footer yet plays below the rim.

    he also won in a small market. 5 rings is the best for small markets while you have boston, lakers winning 15+ then chicago 6.


    And he won 5 in a more stacked league compared to the watered down 90s
    All of which may mean he's in the running for GOAOAT*, but not GOAT.









    * Greatest Over-Achiever Of All Time


    .

  8. #8
    College superstar Cold soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,558

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by feyki
    He's the greatest since Jordan .
    You most definitely can make that case for Duncan.

  9. #9
    College superstar Cold soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,558

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by jayfan
    All of which may mean he's in the running for GOAOAT*, but not GOAT.









    * Greatest Over-Achiever Of All Time


    .
    Duncan was Bill Russell of his era a winner that won close to three decades in the NBA the ultimate teammate to have on your team.

  10. #10
    I get superstar calls j3lademaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,856

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by knicksman
    I have never seen a player as stiff as him becoming a superstar let alone win 5 rings and The guy is a 7 footer yet plays below the rim.

    he also won in a small market. 5 rings is the best for small markets while you have boston, lakers winning 15+ then chicago 6.


    And he won 5 in a more stacked league compared to the watered down 90s
    Sorry, you don't get browny points for being a "stiff" or being unathletic or unskilled or small. Your impact on the court is what it is.

    Oh, and Duncan moved incredibly well for a 7footer and definitely did not play below the rim.

  11. #11
    College superstar Cold soul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,558

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by j3lademaster
    Sorry, you don't get browny points for being a "stiff" or being unathletic or unskilled or small. Your impact on the court is what it is.

    Oh, and Duncan moved incredibly well for a 7footer and definitely did not play below the rim.
    How do you rank three careers of Duncan, Shaq, and Kobe?

  12. #12
    I get superstar calls j3lademaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,856

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cold soul
    How do you rank three careers of Duncan, Shaq, and Kobe?
    duncan, kobe, then shaq purely based on careers.

  13. #13
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,999

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    "Won 5 in a stacked league"

    No he didnt.

    The reason Duncan isnt the GOAT isnt that he didnt play at the level of someone like Jordan for 6 championships. Jordan is by far the greatest. Obviously the next few GOAT candidates are Wilt, Russell, and perhaps Kareem.

  14. #14
    3-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    10,694

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by j3lademaster
    Sorry, you don't get browny points for being a "stiff" or being unathletic or unskilled or small. Your impact on the court is what it is.

    Oh, and Duncan moved incredibly well for a 7footer and definitely did not play below the rim.

    But goat rankings is based on who you respect the most and duncan imo is the player who overcame a bigger hurdle than other players

  15. #15
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    2,999

    Default Re: Why not Duncan for GOAT?

    Quote Originally Posted by knicksman
    But goat rankings is based on who you respect the most and duncan imo is the player who overcame a bigger hurdle than other players
    No, GOAT rankings are based on who was the best on the court. Respect has nothing to do with it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •