-
12-09-2006, 05:13 AM
#166
Da Bulls! Da Bears!
Originally Posted by raiderfan19
First off, learn how to write. If you are older than 14 I feel sorry for you. Second, like i said, all of those guys you mentioned other than jet missed the roughly the same amount of time kurt thomas
Learn how to write...obviously you dont know how to write with that sentence.....
And another thing, come stronger than that....your argument is weak
Let me ask you a question: Who had the better team last year, Mavs or Dallas?
Last edited by DieHardBullsFan; 12-09-2006 at 05:18 AM.
-
12-09-2006, 06:00 AM
#167
Shazam!
Originally Posted by DieHardBullsFan
Learn how to write...obviously you dont know how to write with that sentence.....
And another thing, come stronger than that....your argument is weak
Let me ask you a question: Who had the better team last year, Mavs or Dallas?
ummm... yeah.
-
12-09-2006, 09:45 AM
#168
Operat.Northwoods=9/11
Do you guys not watch the suns and see what nash does for that team.
-
12-09-2006, 09:48 AM
#169
I rule the local playground
Originally Posted by GOBB
21ppg 11.5apg 2.9rpg FG 53% 3pt 52% FT 89%
Whats to say he wont win it again?
Agree?
whats to say? unless no one else has an awesome season, he just might
-
12-09-2006, 09:51 AM
#170
Operat.Northwoods=9/11
Originally Posted by BlackVVaves
Yea. I mean...its SOOO damn easy to play how a point is supposed to play. I mean....EVERYBODY is averaging 11 assists per game. And giving passes reminiscent of Magic's days. And scoring over 50% from 3pt and FG. Yea. He's supposed to do that.
Kid. Guy. Whatever the eff you are. You seriously need to start appraoching things with intelligence. Because I'm starting to doubt you even have a brain. Do you bother to read what you post before ou post it?
Anyway. Its never going to change. Some people are going to support Nash and his MVP's. Others will not. That will never change. We can sit and argue about arguing over who's career was not made better with Nash and all that hoop-la all we want. You still have the doubters. Like someone said before, Nash won't be appreciated until he is gone from the game and the NBA represents the days when ball movement and crisp passes and "fun" basketball was a thing of the 80s.
Well said, i guess it comes down to whether you like the guy or not, you come up with arguments for each side all day. Haters vs non haters
-
12-09-2006, 09:51 AM
#171
Operat.Northwoods=9/11
Originally Posted by BlackVVaves
Yea. I mean...its SOOO damn easy to play how a point is supposed to play. I mean....EVERYBODY is averaging 11 assists per game. And giving passes reminiscent of Magic's days. And scoring over 50% from 3pt and FG. Yea. He's supposed to do that.
Kid. Guy. Whatever the eff you are. You seriously need to start appraoching things with intelligence. Because I'm starting to doubt you even have a brain. Do you bother to read what you post before ou post it?
Anyway. Its never going to change. Some people are going to support Nash and his MVP's. Others will not. That will never change. We can sit and argue about arguing over who's career was not made better with Nash and all that hoop-la all we want. You still have the doubters. Like someone said before, Nash won't be appreciated until he is gone from the game and the NBA represents the days when ball movement and crisp passes and "fun" basketball was a thing of the 80s.
Well said, i guess it comes down to whether you like the guy or not, you come up with arguments for each side all day. Haters vs non haters
STop the hate! Get a girlfriend.
Last edited by Horde of Temujin; 12-09-2006 at 09:58 AM.
-
12-09-2006, 10:19 AM
#172
NBA rookie of the year
This has nothing to do with the actual topic but I just wanted to say it cause most people seem to ignore it...
Nash's "skill level" nor athleticism has improved since leaving Dallas.
The only difference in him as a player is he now takes fewer bad shots. I think everyone remembers those weird twirling fadeaways he loved taking. He's shooting far less of those.
He's improved his decision making and its improved his effectiveness.
-
12-17-2006, 04:35 PM
#173
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
-
12-17-2006, 04:37 PM
#174
The Expert
Originally Posted by GOBB
bump
WHy bump this?
Everybody already agreed that Dirk should've been MVP
-
12-17-2006, 04:37 PM
#175
Very good NBA starter
He's improved his decision making and its improved his effectiveness.
His supporting cast has also improved bigtime...
-
12-17-2006, 04:39 PM
#176
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Originally Posted by Glove_20
WHy bump this?
Everybody already agreed that Dirk should've been MVP
No everybody didnt.
-
12-17-2006, 04:44 PM
#177
The Expert
Originally Posted by GOBB
No everybody didnt.
1. Dream Rocket was the one heavily arguing for Nash, and he even admit it
2. Nobody has had anything to say against the Dirk arguements
-
12-17-2006, 04:48 PM
#178
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Originally Posted by Glove_20
1. Dream Rocket was the one heavily arguing for Nash, and he even admit it
2. Nobody has had anything to say against the Dirk arguements
Wrong but I'll let you tell it.
Nash was the mvp and rightrfully so the last 2yrs. Last yr was arguable with Dirk and Bron. There was no "...should have won". Period.
-
12-17-2006, 04:53 PM
#179
The Expert
Originally Posted by GOBB
Wrong but I'll let you tell it.
Nash was the mvp and rightrfully so the last 2yrs. Last yr was arguable with Dirk and Bron. There was no "...should have won". Period.
Once again, heres my quote that started the Dirk arguements (and finished it off)
Nash in 2005
Ok, he deserved MVP
But in 2006?
NO WAY
Dirk should've been MVP...
Why?
Simple
1. His team had a better record
2. He had less talent around him
3. He put numbers as good as or BETTER than Nash last year
Why didn't Dirk win MVP?
-
12-17-2006, 05:15 PM
#180
Sixers|Eagles|Phillies
Dirk should've been MVP...
Why?
Simple
1. His team had a better record
2. He had less talent around him
3. He put numbers as good as or BETTER than Nash last year
Why didn't Dirk win MVP?
1. by 6 wins without amare Stoudamire
2. Less talent? If you think so but considering Suns lost a starter and changed 2 starters and a 6th man says something.
3. His numbers were not better...you can milk "as good" but not "or BETTER".
Its arguable...nothing definite for Dirk. People still cant get over Steve Nash is an MVP. Only reason they cant accept Dirk not winning last yr and thinkin he all but deserved it which he didnt.
So much for everyone thinks Dirk should've won.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|