More potential: Giannis+ Parker or Wiggins + Lavine

[Purch]

Thoughts?

[moe94]

If I was forced to put money on it, I'd go Giannis/Parker

[Milbuck]

Giannis/Parker by far. Wiggins is a stud, but lol at Lavine being on the same level as the other 3, even in terms of potential.

[robert de niro]

wolves vs bucks 2019 finals book it

[Ray22]

We'll have to see them first, but Giannis + Parker.

[GODbe]

Parker > Wiggins
Giannis > Lavine

[noob cake]

Parker >> Wiggins
Giannis >>>>> Lavine

Fixed

[SexSymbol]

Giannis has absolutely no skills and no IQ whatsoever.

Wiggins is a big question and the one that will turn this comparison one way or another, I'd go with Wiggins/Lavine

[AnaheimLakers24]

lavine will be looking for a burger flipping job in 4 years

[ImKobe]

Rubio + Wiggins >>>

[noob cake]

Rubio + Wiggins >>>

Yes, the same Rubio shooting 35, 36, 38% in his first three years.

[j3lademaster]

Giannis and Parker have that competitiveness that you can't teach. Lavine definitely doesn't have that and Wiggins is questionable.

[Ray22]

Giannis has absolutely no skills and no IQ whatsoever

[Legends66NBA7]

It depends on what their management and coaching can do with them too. Players don't develop well if they bad management and coaching and right now we don't know either team has that.

EDIT - Last year's rankings for front office

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10...nkings-overall

[Milbuck]

Giannis has absolutely no skills and no IQ whatsoever.

What the fu[COLOR="Black"]c[/COLOR]k?