Should we start over on the All-Time List?

[DaSeba5]

I know people probably don't want to do this again, but if you are interested I'll start it over again. It's clear these threads have had too much agenda. We went through 3 threads alone today where voting was closed in like 20 minutes.

If you think yes, I'm going to post every winner's overall accolades and several pictures/.gifs. I'll keep track of the votes and update the number so people don't jump to conclusions that the thread is over and jump to the next one.

If you think yes, I will start at a specific time and the thread will be closed at the same time the following day.

I'm just considering this because we've had posters with negative rep and bad reputations doing this. Plus the list has been ****ed after tonight.

[Fudge]

It's not gonna change a thing.

What exactly is wrong with the other one going on?

[JimmyMcAdocious]

Those types of threads will almost never work on ISH. You would have to filter out the votes, and then how do you decide which votes to keep?

[Cocaine80s]

yes

also make voting green posters only
[COLOR="White"]
also can someone make me green please[/COLOR]

[DaSeba5]

Those types of threads will almost never work on ISH. You would have to filter out the votes, and then how do you decide which votes to keep?

I'll have to rely on ISH posters with green rep and post here enough to tell me who the alts are. Otherwise I'll have to count their votes.

[Milbuck]

also make voting green posters only
[COLOR="White"]
also can someone make me green please[/COLOR]

So will you shut the fu[COLOR="Black"]c[/COLOR]k up then?

Also future negged.

[Cocaine80s]

So will you shut the fu[COLOR="Black"]c[/COLOR]k up then?

Also future negged.

i will stfu if u stop negging

[DaSeba5]

Also if it's like 1-2 votes close by the time I close the thread, I'll keep it going because it's too close to call.

[moe94]

lmao @ russ

It's like he's getting impeached

[DaSeba5]

lmao @ russ

It's like he's getting impeached

[BasedTom]

Yes. russ is a disgrace.

a few people like fpliii, seba, and others can run it without an obvious agenda and bias

[ArbitraryWater]

Yea, but with a mod, or a sane Person (not russwest) leading it... And no Duncan in the top 5 this time

[Orlando Magic]

lmao @ russ

It's like he's getting impeached

[RoundMoundOfReb]

Yes it most definitely should be. And I feel there should be a minimum post requirement for the vote to count.

[fpliii]

I think the only way it'd be worth it is if you decide on a panel in advance (using whatever criteria you want, but voters must participate in all threads), and require some sort of explanation (maybe with character or word minimums, and some semblance of logic behind one's reasoning to avoid agendas). Otherwise, it's just be a repeat of russwest0's list and as such would be redundant.

Also, I know there was some confusion as to whether he was looking to select the best 10 ever or the greatest 10 ever. Maybe decide on that in advance as well (though obviously if everybody has the same criteria, it'd be very boring, so you don't want to be too strict).