Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 81
  1. #16
    Impartial NBA analyst sd3035's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,716

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
    The real question would be...

    how would Mickey Mantle have fared in the 2000's, with PEDs instead of alcohol, and much better medical technology?

    What about Babe Ruth with real nutrition and training?

    It was much harder to hit home runs in Ruth's era. The massive parks and dead baseball more than made up for the slightly weaker pitching

  2. #17
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    258

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by sd3035
    What about Babe Ruth with real nutrition and training?

    It was much harder to hit home runs in Ruth's era. The massive parks and dead baseball more than made up for the slightly weaker pitching
    Well, they actually livened the balls almost right as Ruth was becoming a full-time position player, and the dimensions of YS were favourable to him and other righties. Big reason they called it "the house that Ruth built".

    Unfortunately, it also GREATLY hampered lefties, more than any park in baseball history. Look at Joe D's splits

    Home: .315/.391/.546, 148 homers
    Road: .333/.405/.605, 213 homers

    Anyways, regardless, Ruth was so naturally powerful, had such amazing hand-eye coordination and reaction time at the plate, as well as plate discipline that was well ahead of his time, that he'd be a monster in any generation. GOAT hitter and would have been a historically great pitcher had he stayed on the mound (top 5 pitcher at the start of his career and has an insane world series ERA, something like 0.60 in 50 or so innings).

  3. #18
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    10,932

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by sd3035
    What about Babe Ruth with real nutrition and training?

    It was much harder to hit home runs in Ruth's era. The massive parks and dead baseball more than made up for the slightly weaker pitching
    Yeah, but he only played against whites... When you disallow a huge % of possible athletes you get weak competition

  4. #19
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    10,932

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
    The real question would be...

    how would Mickey Mantle have fared in the 2000's, with PEDs instead of alcohol, and much better medical technology?
    We don't have alcohol in the 2000's? Once a 'lic, always a 'lic

  5. #20
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    258

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
    We don't have alcohol in the 2000's? Once a 'lic, always a 'lic
    Even with his many vices, and the litany of injuries he endured, he was one of the best ever.

  6. #21
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    14,203

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by 24-Inch_Chrome
    Just give them all the World Series rings now.
    Come on now. You know baseball doesn't work like that.

  7. #22
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    17,126

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by Real Men Wear Green
    Pre-steroids Bonds had a body that could make for a good point guard I guess but with the various skills required to play basketball it's really impossible to tell what kind of player he would be. The level of athleticism has improved over the years but assuming a guy would be a good player from a completely different sport just because we turned back the clock is a major stretch.

    This is libelous.

    Unbecomming of a moderator.

  8. #23
    n/a IncarceratedBob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,725

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    If he gets to use a corked bat like babe ruth, joltin joe, maris, etc used then he'd hit 100

  9. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    5,645

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
    Come on now. You know baseball doesn't work like that.
    It usually doesn't. Mays and Bonds together in an outfield would be something special.

  10. #25
    Impartial NBA analyst sd3035's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    7,716

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by PejaTheSerbSnip
    Well, they actually livened the balls almost right as Ruth was becoming a full-time position player, and the dimensions of YS were favourable to him and other righties. Big reason they called it "the house that Ruth built".

    Unfortunately, it also GREATLY hampered lefties, more than any park in baseball history. Look at Joe D's splits

    Home: .315/.391/.546, 148 homers
    Road: .333/.405/.605, 213 homers

    Anyways, regardless, Ruth was so naturally powerful, had such amazing hand-eye coordination and reaction time at the plate, as well as plate discipline that was well ahead of his time, that he'd be a monster in any generation. GOAT hitter and would have been a historically great pitcher had he stayed on the mound (top 5 pitcher at the start of his career and has an insane world series ERA, something like 0.60 in 50 or so innings).
    Babe Ruth had 347 HR at home, and 367 on the road

    He was also not just destroying every individual, but hitting more HR than most entire teams on multiple occasions. If the ball was really live, almost everyone else must have sucked

  11. #26
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    10,932

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
    Come on now. You know baseball doesn't work like that.
    The two GOAT position players on the same team would be something really special.

    Nobody that played their prime pre-integration can qualify as a GOAT in my book

  12. #27
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,610

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    3-4 HR's a game. So probably 400,000,000

  13. #28
    NBA Superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    14,203

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
    The two GOAT position players on the same team would be something really special.

    Nobody that played their prime pre-integration can qualify as a GOAT in my book
    I mean of course it would be special to watch, but there's absolutely no guarantees for rings ever.

    Ted Williams is the greatest hitter ever.

  14. #29
    Game. Set. Match. bdreason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    HB, CA
    Posts
    24,875

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Does he get to bring the steroids and HGH with him?

  15. #30
    The Wizard ralph_i_el's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Born Under a Bad Sign
    Posts
    10,932

    Default Re: If Barry Bonds played in the 1960s, what kind of numbers would he average?

    Quote Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
    I mean of course it would be special to watch, but there's absolutely no guarantees for rings ever.

    Ted Williams is the greatest hitter ever.
    Probably, but Bonds and Mays were 5 tool players and were comparable hitters. Bonds has the best eye of any hitter I have ever seen. I'd take Mays over Williams for that GOAT level D

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •