Yoo what the **** was up with C-Webb at the end of the game?!

[ArbitraryWater]

Bruh, they got the ball anyway! AND an open three... dude was fuming

[VengefulAngel]

Bruh, they got the ball anyway! AND an open three... dude was fuming

He's right though bro.


Anyways on topic he was getting flashbacks.

[Akhenaten]

Fake outrage, it's not like an offensive foul would have give SAS freethrows just possession which they ended up getting still, plus ginobli committed a technical foul prior to that anyway. OKC should have gotten a FT plus possession.

[Lebron23]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QPB9NBUG2g

[keep-itreal]

Anyways on topic he was getting flashbacks.

[Im Still Ballin]

He was triggered

Shades of Mike Bibby getting socked in the face by Kobe

[Naero]

He's right though bro.


Anyways on topic he was getting flashbacks.

[ArbitraryWater]

Was that fake outrage?

I mean, dude has to know they wouldnt have gotten a better shot than they did anyway... dude was choking up at one point.

That was HARDLY an egregious no-call.

The worrying thing is so many people buying into his meltdown, agreeing with him.

From the other thread

He said 'it doesn't even matter what happens after that'.
Well, it actually does. They still got possession. The non call actually put them in a better position.
Plenty of non calls leave you worse off.

exactly. What a diva.

[Im Still Ballin]

Buying into what? The narrative that the Spurs got cheated? Perhaps. But the sheer bluntness of the no-call.. You can understand holding no calls, but for the inbounds man to blatantly push the defender... How do you not call that? Not seeing it isn't an excuse, everyone saw it. It was just bizarre. Irrelevant of the fact that YES, the no-call actually put them in a better position with a 3 on 1 which Danny Green stuffed up by taking so goddamn long and not passing it to Manu... It was just such a blatant foul.

[ArbitraryWater]

Buying into what? The narrative that the Spurs got cheated? Perhaps. But the sheer bluntness of the no-call.. You can understand holding no calls, but for the inbounds man to blatantly push the defender... How do you not call that? Not seeing it isn't an excuse, everyone saw it. It was just bizarre. Irrelevant of the fact that YES, the no-call actually put them in a better position with a 3 on 1 which Danny Green stuffed up by taking so goddamn long and not passing it to Manu... It was just such a blatant foul.

Whaaat? It really wasn't, though... Manu previously already stepped on the line and had his hands all over it, that would be the first violation

[ArbitraryWater]

Cmon man... got Magic saying it was the worst missed call in playoff history

if C-Webb wouldn't have teared up no one would even be saying this shit.

[Im Still Ballin]

I know, but that's irrelevant

They are all missed calls

Just that the inbounds man shove was so blatantly obvious

That's the point

[sd3035]

Manu already stepped out of bounds, so his flop was irrelevant

Webber is just a salty bitch

[Wally450]

He was triggered.

[Velocirap31]

Manu already stepped out of bounds, so his flop was irrelevant

Webber is just a salty bitch

If this is true, then you're completely right. Should have been a technical foul on Manu then.