-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
.
MJ went 1-9 as an 8 seed, whereas Lebron never had less than a 4 seed in the playoffs..
We don't know how lebron would do with a low-seeded cast, like if his 9-seed had been an 8 seed in 2005, and faced the champion pistons in the first round... But we can guess that he'd get swept the same way with an 8 seed as he got swept with a 2 seed and 4 seed (07', 18'), and record loss with a 2 seed (14')..
obviously, if you get swept by champs as a high seed, why wouldn't it happen as a low seed?.. it's a knock on lebron that he got demolished/swept with 2 seeds, and MJ only 8 seeds.
Ultimately, we can't compare Lebron's 1-4 seeds to Jordan's 8 seeds, but we know that jordan's 1-4 seeds greatly outperformed Lebron's.. MJ never lost as 1 or 2 seed (6/6), while lebron lost with a 1 or 2 seed six times (including various sweeps and record losses)
And people will say that MJ should've prevailed by simply achieving better teams/seeds like lebron did, but that negates any "competition" argument, since lebron should've prevailed in the Finals by achieving a better team beforehand as well. The objective is always to BE the better/favored team, not a worse team that must complain about "comp".. unfortunately, lebron's inability to field the best teams has caused people to change the goat criteria away from winning, into losing but appearing to face great odds.. it's a way to weaponize losing when your star can't get it done ("oh, but we were so outmatched", woah is me bs)
.
Last edited by 3ball; 01-21-2019 at 02:21 PM.
-
SexLand
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
It’s done then. 1-9 finally got the better of him. 3ball crumbling like a cookie, folding like a cheap tent. We won.
-
Le11th
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
The fact that Brannies expect years 1-3 Jordan to single handedly beat a top 3 team all time in and of itself proves Jordan's the undisputed GOAT.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by superduper
The fact that Brannies expect years 1-3 Jordan to single handedly beat a top 3 team all time in and of itself proves Jordan's the undisputed GOAT.
He had Orlando Woolridge's 20ppg in the '85 playoffs and 21ppg in '86.
Nothing single handily about MJ's first 2 playoffs
-
NBA Legend
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by superduper
The fact that Brannies expect years 1-3 Jordan to single handedly beat a top 3 team all time in and of itself proves Jordan's the undisputed GOAT.
He got swept in the 1st round in his 4th year as well...to a Boston team that got taken the distance by a team with... [wait for it]... ZERO all-stars
-
Le11th
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by FKAri
He got swept in the 1st round in his 4th year as well...to a Boston team that got taken the distance by a team with... [wait for it]... ZERO all-stars
So why did Bran get swept in embarrassing fashion by the exact same team that King James 1v50'd against and not only took to 7 by himself last year with ZERO allstars but also beat them this year single handedly without his 2nd and 3rd options?
-
Euros rule NBA, UMAD?
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by FKAri
He got swept in the 1st round in his 4th year as well...to a Boston team that got taken the distance by a team with... [wait for it]... ZERO all-stars
4th year? 4th year was 87-88. He lost in the 2nd round to Detroit. Maybe you mean third year(86-87)?
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by FKAri
[COLOR="DarkRed"]MJ got swept[/COLOR]
With an 8 seed, which is better than lebron getting swept with a 2 seed and 4 seed, or record loss with a 2 seed
-
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
its actually 2-9 for future reference
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
-
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by 3ball
Imagine considering someone for goat that was a 3-time loser in 2 different rounds at (2nd round and Finals).. an all-time loser in 2 different rounds..
And imagine considering someone for goat that lost 6 times with a 1 or 2 seed, including sweeps and record losses, and lost 10 times in 13 playoffs despite never having less than a 4 seed
LeBron won a championship without another all star teammate in 2016
Why couldn
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Facts about "1-9" (for reference purposes)
Originally Posted by 3ball
Imagine considering someone for goat that was a 3-time loser in 2 different rounds at (2nd round and Finals).. an all-time loser in 2 different rounds..
And imagine considering someone for goat that lost 6 times with a 1 or 2 seed, including sweeps and record losses, and lost 10 times in 13 playoffs despite never having less than a 4 seed
At least that person didn't get his cheeks busted in the 1st round of the playoffs
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|