The team that had to play defense as well as squash you offensively = original dream team
Results 16 to 21 of 21
-
07-22-2019, 10:01 AM #16NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Wisconsin farm
- Posts
- 21,386
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
-
07-22-2019, 10:07 AM #17NBA Legend
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Posts
- 17,667
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
The original dream team didn't need to play defense. Their defense was their offense when you blow out every team by 50+
Originally Posted by Jasper
-
07-22-2019, 10:09 AM #18NBA Legend
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Posts
- 17,667
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
MJ wouldn't last through an Olympics today. Here's what he had to say about blowing teams out by 50+ and how it took a major toll on his body and mind.
"I don't like giving advice on things like that," said Jordan. "Everybody has their own individual goals. Some players may have goals of representing their country, and if that's the case, they should go. But they should know what they're getting into, a grueling five-week process that will eventually take its toll on you mentally and physically."
-
07-22-2019, 10:10 AM #19Good college starter
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 3,058
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
lul @ anyone saying 04+ years
BUT BUT BUT THEY CAN SHOOT 3'S
you ain't getting a shot off vs pippen jordan and stockton scrubs
-
07-22-2019, 10:13 AM #20NBA Legend
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 16,609
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
92 roster has become so overrated. It wasn't even the best roster that they could have formed at the time. They just grabbed all the big name guys they could for an NBA ad campaign.
-
07-22-2019, 10:14 AM #21Good college starter
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Posts
- 3,058
Re: Squashing the debate of which era was better
so you're telling me there was even MORE talent in the league? Originally Posted by FKAri
hahahaha prove my point thank you!
Reply With Quote
