Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 112
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,561

    Default The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/s...ichael-beasley

    The Minnesota Timberwolves offered to trade Michael Beasley to the Los Angeles Lakers for a first-round draft pick, but the Lakers turned them down, according to a league source. Since there is a dollar-for-dollar penalty for tax-paying teams, taking on Beasley's $6.2 million contract would add another $6.2 million to their tax bill and cost the Lakers an extra $12.4 million.


    I DO NOT WANT JIM BUSS ANY MORE

  2. #2
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,615

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

































  3. #3
    King Heno qrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tucson/520!
    Posts
    22,821

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick


  4. #4
    MJ of ISH *Brotherhood (e)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    2,966

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Wow!

  5. #5
    College superstar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Its far less than that as we are halfway through the season. Probably an extra 6.4M to have someone with the ability to score coming off the pine.

    I didn't know Sterling bought the Lakers...

  6. #6
    Stare bagelred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    26,177

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........

  7. #7
    Purple n' Gold KOBEtherealKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,947

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    I understand. Mitch probably said tpe or nothing. Lakers need cap space.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,561

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by bagelred
    I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........
    Ya for every other team... But we've always spent money to win. Always. Suddenly we are cutting costs? Its really the only way TO win. This guy is a GAME CHANGER if he lives up to even half his potential. Also doesn't he have another yr on his contract?

    So basically we can only use the TPE..... Which we have yet to use and may not use at all. Nice.

  9. #9
    Knicks 2015 Champs MeLO MvP 15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,613

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by bagelred
    I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........
    BUT.... if a team actually wants Beasley (and LA should), getting his bird rights in the summer AND the extra 1/3-1/2 of a season with him, could be enough to warrant giving up a first and pay the extra money.

  10. #10
    Kobe Bean LABean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,453

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    I'm just wondering how we can get MarShon Brooks.
    Anyone have a good scenario for that?

  11. #11
    KR∆PES KeyNote's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Pasadena, California
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    So they're going to go into the playoff with the big 3 and a bunch of scrubs

    this is UNBELIEVABLE

  12. #12
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,535

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Way I see it is that they're not in a hurry to make a deal since March 15th is 2 weeks away. They probably want to see if the picks can be added in a Dwight package.

  13. #13
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,605

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    I almost feel bad for the Lakers. They thought they would have CP3 and Dwight this season, now they have nothing.


    JK that's hilarious

  14. #14
    KR∆PES KeyNote's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Pasadena, California
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Every time metta world peace bricks a lay up, air balls a 3, or dribbles like an old man into traffic for a turnover..kobe should pick the ball up and chuck it up at the jim buss' luxury box

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,561

    Default Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick

    Quote Originally Posted by KeyNote
    Every time metta world peace bricks a lay up, air balls a 3, or dribbles like an old man into traffic for a turnover..kobe should pick the ball up and chuck it up at the jim buss' luxury box

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •