-
The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/s...ichael-beasley
The Minnesota Timberwolves offered to trade Michael Beasley to the Los Angeles Lakers for a first-round draft pick, but the Lakers turned them down, according to a league source. Since there is a dollar-for-dollar penalty for tax-paying teams, taking on Beasley's $6.2 million contract would add another $6.2 million to their tax bill and cost the Lakers an extra $12.4 million.
I DO NOT WANT JIM BUSS ANY MORE
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
-
King Heno
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
-
MJ of ISH *Brotherhood
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Its far less than that as we are halfway through the season. Probably an extra 6.4M to have someone with the ability to score coming off the pine.
I didn't know Sterling bought the Lakers...
-
Stare
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........
-
Purple n' Gold
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
I understand. Mitch probably said tpe or nothing. Lakers need cap space.
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Originally Posted by bagelred
I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........
Ya for every other team... But we've always spent money to win. Always. Suddenly we are cutting costs? Its really the only way TO win. This guy is a GAME CHANGER if he lives up to even half his potential. Also doesn't he have another yr on his contract?
So basically we can only use the TPE..... Which we have yet to use and may not use at all. Nice.
-
Knicks 2015 Champs
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Originally Posted by bagelred
I've said this before with Barbosa. Taking on Beasley adds a HUGE tax cost for the year for what 30 games? And give up a 1st rounder? Not worth it..........
BUT.... if a team actually wants Beasley (and LA should), getting his bird rights in the summer AND the extra 1/3-1/2 of a season with him, could be enough to warrant giving up a first and pay the extra money.
-
Kobe Bean
-
KR∆PES
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
So they're going to go into the playoff with the big 3 and a bunch of scrubs
this is UNBELIEVABLE
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Way I see it is that they're not in a hurry to make a deal since March 15th is 2 weeks away. They probably want to see if the picks can be added in a Dwight package.
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
I almost feel bad for the Lakers. They thought they would have CP3 and Dwight this season, now they have nothing.
JK that's hilarious
-
KR∆PES
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Every time metta world peace bricks a lay up, air balls a 3, or dribbles like an old man into traffic for a turnover..kobe should pick the ball up and chuck it up at the jim buss' luxury box
-
Re: The lakers DECLINED beasley for a 1st rd pick
Originally Posted by KeyNote
Every time metta world peace bricks a lay up, air balls a 3, or dribbles like an old man into traffic for a turnover..kobe should pick the ball up and chuck it up at the jim buss' luxury box
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|