Better Playoff Supporting Cast...

[branslowski]

Wont put the names of the stars these players are supporting due to player hate bais:

Cast A:

17ppg 5ast 4reb 18.8 PER

13ppg 4reb 2ast 12.5 PER

15ppg 7reb 2ast 17 PER

16ppg 4reb 2ast 16.3 PER

VS

Cast B:

19ppg 11reb 3ast 24 PER

11ppg 4reb 2ast 10 PER

10ppg 2reb 2ast 10 PER

9ppg 8reb 2ast 15 PER


Now when you first see it without the names of whos cast it is, you will see cast A as a COLLECTIVE GROUP is better help...But once you know the names of who these players are cast members of, the agenda will soon peak and have you changing your mind saying "B is better", just because of agenda..I promise you...

[GIF REACTION]

The one with Pau Gasol

[branslowski]

The one with Pau Gasol

ofcource..

Cause the collective group means nothing..

[RRR3]

Edit: 05 Mavericks

[aj1987]

Cast B because they performed better in the PO's.

[branslowski]

Cast B because they performed better in the PO's.

Yet Cast A as a group have better playoff numbers than than cast B does as a group...The only difference is the main guy they playin with.

[DMAVS41]

Yet Cast A as a group have better playoff numbers than than cast B does as a group...The only difference is the main guy they playin with.

Not many are going to agree that the 05 Mavs were better than the title winning Lakers.

Again, there is a reason why the 08 through 10 Lakers grade out much better than the 06 Mavs. And that is telling...as the 06 Mavs were clearly much better than the 05 Mavs.

Just take the L

[RRR3]

Why did you omit Odom?

[RRR3]

he didn't..

Well then he rounded the stats wrong. Where's Bynum? No one is saying he was amazing in the playoffs but he was more impactful than fisher ffs

[branslowski]

Not many are going to agree that the 05 Mavs were better than the title winning Lakers.

Again, there is a reason why the 08 through 10 Lakers grade out much better than the 06 Mavs. And that is telling...as the 06 Mavs were clearly much better than the 05 Mavs.

Just take the L

Take a L when my FACTUAL clear Raw player-by-player facts prove I'm correct?...What planet you from bruh?

I'm like Roy Jones Jr. in the 88' Olympics and you like the Asian and the Judges, I clearly won but ya bias is getting the best of you..

[branslowski]

Well then he rounded the stats wrong. Where's Bynum? No one is saying he was amazing in the playoffs but he was more impactful than fisher ffs

Bynum wit the 6ppg 4reb Finals avg? Stacked!!

[DMAVS41]

Take a L when my FACTUAL clear Raw player-by-player facts prove I'm correct?...What planet you from bruh?

I'm like Roy Jones Jr. in the 88' Olympics and you like the Asian and the Judges, I clearly won but ya bias is getting the best of you..

Raw stats only and PER is so dumb. Again, you won't stand by this analysis.

Just like you don't stand by the rings mean everything line.

How many times do you have to be shown this? Do I really need to post the Duncan or Dirk playoff numbers compared to Kobe again? Yet you claim Kobe was a better playoff performer than both of those guys.

At least be consistent man. It's dumb to argue this way, but at least be consistent with it.

[DMAVS41]

Bynum wit the 6ppg 4reb Finals avg? Stacked!!

So finals average matters a lot?

Kobe wit the 16/5/4 37% shooting in the 00 Finals. Wait, let me guess, it doesn't matter with Kobe for some reason....


Also, Bynum in 2010 was actually very good overall. A comparison on your own method:

Bynum 9/7/1 17.3 PER
Tyson Chandler 8/9/0 15.2 PER

So let me ask. Do you claim that Bynum was better than Tyson was in 10 vs 11?

[SyRyanYang]

Obviously Kobe had a decent supporting cast and the team was well coached and had great chemistry. But only haters would tell you that team was stacked. Just look at how many players are still active apart from Kobe and Pau.

[branslowski]

So finals average matters a lot?

Kobe wit the 16/5/4 37% shooting in the 00 Finals. Wait, let me guess, it doesn't matter with Kobe for some reason....:roll:


Also, Bynum in 2010 was actually very good overall. A comparison on your own method:

Bynum 9/7/1 17.3 PER
Tyson Chandler 8/9/0 15.2 PER

So let me ask. Do you claim that Bynum was better than Tyson was in 10 vs 11?

Get ethered on the thread topic with facts, and then jump to something that isn't relevent to the thread topic, classic, where'd you learn that?