-
Impartial NBA analyst
Re: Hakeem and Shaq>>>>wilt/Russel
Originally Posted by LAZERUSS
Yep...the total of extent of the research done by the "bashers."
Their only form of research is in their coloring books.
that's clearly above 13 feet, don't be a hater
-
NBA Legend
Re: Hakeem and Shaq>>>>wilt/Russel
Originally Posted by ClipperRevival
It's just so annoying to see youngsters so blatantly disrespect greats of the past and on the flip side, seeing the old timers give little respect to today's players. Why can't you people be more objective and just try to see things for what they are? This board is so littered with both groups. Do you not love this game? If so, why must you have such agendas and such biased beliefs/opinions?
I hope you were not directing that line at me.
Here is my current all-time Top-13...
1. Wilt
2. MJ
3. Magic
4. Kareem
5. Russell
6. Shaq
7. Duncan
8. Kobe
9. Lebron
10. Bird
11. Moses
12. Hakeem
13. Dr. J
Two players from the 60's, three players from the 70's, 4 players from the 80's, 2 from the 90's, and 2 from the 00's. And all of them spanned at least two decades.
-
Re: Hakeem and Shaq>>>>wilt/Russel
Wilt is a good modern day backup centre. I wouldn't trust him with scoring though he doesn't seem to be as effective as other ATG notice the wilting in the playoffs. Russell on the other hand would be an Elton brand who can't make jump shots and would have a reggie Evans sort of role. I have no doubt these guys would not match up with the likes of dwight, DMC, gasol etc. they will still be good role players but a player like mozgov in the 60s people will be saying he is 9 feet tall and could do layups from half court.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Hakeem and Shaq>>>>wilt/Russel
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|