more overrated dynasty: bulls or spurs

[mehyaM24]

Oh Lord. Just shut this thread down now.

ish is FULL of crybabies

i never said the bulls or spurs werent good (in fact, i think the 2014 spurs win a handful of titles in the 90s), but that doesnt mean, as "dynasties", they werent overrated or had NO flaws.

[SouBeachTalents]

ish is FULL of crybabies

i never said the bulls or spurs werent good (in fact, i think the 2014 spurs win a handful of titles in the 90s), but that doesnt mean, as "dynasties", they werent overrated or had NO flaws.

What major flaws did the Bulls have? They won 6 titles and were only pushed to a Game 7 twice during that entire run

[Fork]

Bulls loose the Rockets, and I bet if you put in any other superstar in Jordan's place (i.e Lebron or Kobe) they still win 6 titles since the teams were so stacked. Especially in 96

[Marchesk]

Never won back to back.

Should have, though.

[Marchesk]

Bulls loose the Rockets, and I bet if you put in any other superstar in Jordan's place (i.e Lebron or Kobe) they still win 6 titles since the teams were so stacked. Especially in 96

Come on man. Both Kobe and Lebron have had dissapointing finals. Jordan didn't. And that Sonics series doesn't matter, because he still got FMVP, and they were up 3-0, so it wasn't in doubt.

[houston]

none both deserve props

[Duncan21formvp]

Lakers in the 80's

Here was there comp in the 80's.

81
Houston Rockets: 40-42 (*** they lost this series)

82
Phoenix Suns: 46-36
San Antonio Spurs: 48-34

83
Portland Trail Blazers: 46-36
San Antonio Spurs: 53-29

84
Kings: 38-44
Mavericks: 43-39
Suns: 41-41

85
Suns: 36-46
Blazers: 42-40
Nuggets: 52-30

86
Spurs: 35-47
Mavericks: 44-38
Rockets: 51-31 (*** they lost this series)

87
Nuggets: 37-45
Warriors: 42-40
Sonics: 39-43

88
Spurs: 31-51
Jazz: 47-35
Mavs: 53-29

[deja vu]

Bulls loose the Rockets, and I bet if you put in any other superstar in Jordan's place (i.e Lebron or Kobe) they still win 6 titles since the teams were so stacked. Especially in 96

You mean the 2/5 guy?

[Paul George 24]

bulls:
-played an injured lakers team without kareem in the finals
-jordan faced zero swingmen of note besides maybe drexler? LOL
-pippen was the second best player (perimeter) in the 90s..double LOL
-won titles during the expansion era. stacked the deck ala miami except against WORST competition
-did it all with no other super team. the 80s had the SIXERS,LAKERS,CELTICS

spurs:
-never repeated
-faced over the hill teams
-their "superstar" is more overrated than jordan (shaq,wilt,kareem,russell,hakeem are all better)
-as i mentioned, facing over the hill teams, just picking up the scraps like vultures

LAKERS IS MORE OVERRATED..............IMO

PLAYED PACERS WIHEN THEIR STARTING CENTER IS RIK SMITS,OLD MUTOMBO,AND JASON COLLINS & KMART

[JellyBean]

Lakers in the 80's

Here was there comp in the 80's.

81
Houston Rockets: 40-42 (*** they lost this series)

82
Phoenix Suns: 46-36
San Antonio Spurs: 48-34

83
Portland Trail Blazers: 46-36
San Antonio Spurs: 53-29

84
Kings: 38-44
Mavericks: 43-39
Suns: 41-41

85
Suns: 36-46
Blazers: 42-40
Nuggets: 52-30

86
Spurs: 35-47
Mavericks: 44-38
Rockets: 51-31 (*** they lost this series)

87
Nuggets: 37-45
Warriors: 42-40
Sonics: 39-43

88
Spurs: 31-51
Jazz: 47-35
Mavs: 53-29

The Lord did not hear my request to shut this thread down.

That 80s Laker dynasty faced some tough teams. Don't let the records fool you. It wasn't a cake walk for the Lakers. When you are facing teams like the Denver Nuggets, Spurs, and Suns all three were capable of scoring 110-125 points a night. That is not some weak competition, my friend.

[sekachu]

bulls:
-played an injured lakers team without kareem in the finals
-jordan faced zero swingmen of note besides maybe drexler? LOL
-pippen was the second best player (perimeter) in the 90s..double LOL
-won titles during the expansion era. stacked the deck ala miami except against WORST competition
-did it all with no other super team. the 80s had the SIXERS,LAKERS,CELTICS

spurs:
-never repeated
-faced over the hill teams
-their "superstar" is more overrated than jordan (shaq,wilt,kareem,russell,hakeem are all better)
-as i mentioned, facing over the hill teams, just picking up the scraps like vultures

Sound like you are damn bitter after the heat lost. Talk about weak era. All the things you listed above could be applied on heat too. Weakest east ever, no superstar in the east. Colluded with the second best player wade and so on.......

[PickernRoller]

The Spurs were never a dynasty. The assumption this thread is based off from the get-go is wrong.

[TheMan]

We're really now entertaining idiotic arguments about "dynasties being overrated"? Really scraping the bottom of the barrell with absolute morons like the OP.




OP putting in dat work to be ISH shittiest poster.

[BlackVVaves]

Spurs have won 50 games every season except the lockout year for 14 straight years. But, somehow they're overrated.

The Bulls of the 90s won 6 championships in one decade. But, somehow they're overrated.

Hey OP, what team do you support? Because I'm sure as hell we can all nitpick and ridicule that franchise in quintessential troll fashion to illustrate how overrated they are.

[BlackVVaves]

The Spurs were never a dynasty. The assumption this thread is based off from the get-go is wrong.

Who made up the subjective rule that you're only a dynasty if your championships are in concession?

So, the 80s Celtics weren't a dynasty right?