Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 47 of 47
  1. #46
    Local High School Star MoBe1Kanobi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,316

    Default Re: Players who wouldn't be shit if not for sports?

    Quote Originally Posted by egokiller
    You missed the point completely. Technology advancements have bypassed any phsycial advantages that would give any edge whatsoever in a war. What's the different if an athletic guy is pressing a nuke button or and unathletic guy? Absolutely no difference to the outcome whatsoever. We aren't talking soliders ground game here. You're living in the past man, try and get your ass up to speed with how things work in present day.

    You're a moron if you can't comprehend the simple fact that the reason why these guys get paid millions is because of the fans who are willing to watch them and be entertained. Where do you think the money comes from?
    ur getting way too ahead of yourself if you think war is just some ****** behind a desk playing call of duty

    theres a reason why our military goes through strenous excercise trainining

    the on ground game is vital till this day whether you believe it or not

    war isnt just a game of nukes vs nukes even though ur simple ass mind would love for it to be that simple

    anyways this is all irrelevant because u said if both sides have the same advantages in terms of resources and weapons than any other advantage should be noted AS SUCH

    but go ahead keep playing CoD for your military education

  2. #47
    The Mind Fvcker egokiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    12,144

    Default Re: Players who wouldn't be shit if not for sports?

    Quote Originally Posted by MoBe1Kanobi
    ur getting way too ahead of yourself if you think war is just some ****** behind a desk playing call of duty

    theres a reason why our military goes through strenous excercise trainining

    the on ground game is vital till this day whether you believe it or not

    war isnt just a game of nukes vs nukes even though ur simple ass mind would love for it to be that simple

    anyways this is all irrelevant because u said if both sides have the same advantages in terms of resources and weapons than any other advantage should be noted AS SUCH

    but go ahead keep playing CoD for your military education
    I never said that it's just nukes and nukes, I'm saying that technology has advanced to the point where both sides have the same advantages in terms of resources and weapons and that it doesn't matter how phsycially fit you are to press the nuke button. What the hell good is your ground troops if the land is radioactive? This isn't the civil war times, or medival times, or whatever time frame you are trying to apply your weak argument to. This is present day.

    Doesn't matter how fast the person is who presses the nuke button can run the 40 yard dash.

    Doesn't matter how high you can jump when you are in a fighter jet.

    Doesn't matter how much you can bench press when you are driving a tank.

    Your argument of group A being more physical than group B all else equal and winning the battle hindges on the fact that the war was fought prior to all these technological advancements. Again, we are talking present day. Until you can prove that person A can't press a nuke button just as easily as person B who is more athletic, then you have no argument.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •