-
Local High School Star
-
Lol
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by ShawkFactory
There are 6-7 accounts that literally have no purpose but to talk about Lebron
Most are probably the same person.
Gileraver and knicksman are the two most glaring ones. Who else were you thinking of?
-
The One
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by MoBe1Kanobi
Kobe's career ring percentage vs Curry's career ring percentage
Kobe: 5.00 rings Steph: 1.00 rings
400% more rings than curry boy
Curry is 27, Jordan was only 26 when he started winning...
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by riseagainst
Curry's 3point%: 44.6%
Kobe's career FG%: 44.8%
now look at Kobe as a SHOOTING guard dimes career average
and compare to supposedly a PG curry distributor
I'd think as a ball hog Curry would have tons of dimes above an "A typipcal" shooting guard....
-
Laker Nation
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by MoBe1Kanobi
Kobe's career ring percentage vs Curry's career ring percentage
Kobe: 5.00 rings Steph: 1.00 rings
400% more rings than curry boy
I believe you just compared their totals instead of what you claimed to be "ring percentage".
If we actually use ring percentage it would be:
Kobe: 5/7
vs
Curry: 1/1
Therefore Curry wins here.
-
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by RRR3
Gileraver and knicksman are the two most glaring ones. Who else were you thinking of?
Idk man. There's a couple others for sure.
Their names don't really register with me. Completely insignificant.
Like reading spam emails
-
The GOATS
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by CelticBaller
Curry is 27, Jordan was only 26 when he started winning...
Means nothing, to win that many rings you must be relentless and Curry is not. We heard all of this with lebron, guess what? Only 2 rings lol. At least lebron made 5 straight finals and showed everybody he deserved the hype. Lebron>>>Curry
-
Laker Nation
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by Jasper
now look at Kobe as a SHOOTING guard dimes career average
and compare to supposedly a PG curry distributor
I'd think as a ball hog Curry would have tons of dimes above an "A typipcal" shooting guard....
A better measure of being a distributor or a better rebounder would be by asst% or rebound%, not totals, because minutes played affect those and that could be deceiving for simple basket minds.
Let's look at their ASST% for their careers:
Kobe: 24.3%
Curry: 32.6%
Looks like Curry takes this one.
And "ball hog"? Don't get me started on USG%, but here they are:
Kobe: 31.8%
Curry: 26.6%
So in conclusion, Curry is the far superior efficient scorer and a better distributor of the ball while taking less away from the team's offensive flow than Kobe does.
-
Local High School Star
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by riseagainst
I believe you just compared their totals instead of what you claimed to be "ring percentage".
If we actually use ring percentage it would be:
Kobe: 5/7
vs
Curry: 1/1
Therefore Curry wins here.
i didnt say finals percentage
i said ring percentage
which in my context means.. "how many rings coes each player have... percentage wise"
meaning
kobe has 400% more rings than curry
good try though
buddy
-
Laker Nation
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by MoBe1Kanobi
i didnt say finals percentage
i said ring percentage
which in my context means.. "how many rings coes each player have... percentage wise"
meaning
kobe has 400% more rings than curry
good try though
buddy
Kobe's career ring percentage vs Curry's career ring percentage
Kobe: 5.00 rings Steph: 1.00 rings
400% more rings than curry boy
bruh this is exactly what you said... how are you still arguing? I don't think you understand what you wrote.
-
Lol
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by MoBe1Kanobi
i didnt say finals percentage
i said ring percentage
which in my context means.. "how many rings coes each player have... percentage wise"
meaning
kobe has 400% more rings than curry
good try though
buddy
-
The GOATS
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by riseagainst
A better measure of being a distributor or a better rebounder would be by asst% or rebound%, not totals, because minutes played affect those and that could be deceiving for simple basket minds.
Let's look at their ASST% for their careers:
Kobe: 24.3%
Curry: 32.6%
Looks like Curry takes this one.
And "ball hog"? Don't get me started on USG%, but here they are:
Kobe: 31.8%
Curry: 26.6%
So in conclusion, Curry is the far superior efficient scorer and a better distributor of the ball while taking less away from the team's offensive flow than Kobe does.
You're a clown and anybody using percentages in any argument is an idiot as that is directly affected by their teammates and Curry has had way better depth to help his numbers. Currys teammates complete plays, Kobe's teammates were dumb as rocks and couldn't cut, catch and finish, or be deadly enough to create premium spacing.
-
Local High School Star
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by RRR3
What's the broken pic?
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by CAstill
You're a clown and anybody using percentages in any argument is an idiot as that is directly affected by their teammates and Curry has had way better depth to help his numbers. Currys teammates complete plays, Kobe's teammates were dumb as rocks and couldn't cut, catch and finish, or be deadly enough to create premium spacing.
You act like Curry has had this supporting cast his entire career... Gtfo with that shit. Kobe had some elite teams just like Curry has an elite team now.
-
Laker Nation
Re: Curry's career 3point% vs Kobe's career FG%
Originally Posted by CAstill
You're a clown and anybody using percentages in any argument is an idiot as that is directly affected by their teammates and Curry has had way better depth to help his numbers. Currys teammates complete plays, Kobe's teammates were dumb as rocks and couldn't cut, catch and finish, or be deadly enough to create premium spacing.
all i hear are excuses. You don't think Curry being able to score from anywhere has anything to do with his teammates being open? Curry this year is better than Kobe ever was, just deal with it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|