Better passing team? 2002 Kings or 2014 Spurs?

[NBAplayoffs2001]

I got the Spurs.

[triangleoffense]

The Spurs since the Kings had no real defense or offensive center that could compete like the spurs do... Duncan is really more a PF/C than a true PF.

[33teeth]

Most of the posters on this board were still wearing huggies in 2002 so I wouldn't expect many insightful responses.

[tmacattack33]

Kings, come on now.

[QuebecBaller]

[imdaman99]

The Spurs since the Kings had no real defense or offensive center that could compete like the spurs do... Duncan is really more a PF/C than a true PF.

Divac was a great passer

[Pearleojam]

Im Spurs fan, but i pick Kings

[NBAplayoffs2001]

Divac was a great passer

Was a nasty passer more like it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-q_sWdxBK8

[TheReal Kendall]

Idk. I'm leaning towards the Spurs but I think that's because I just seen them play a few months ago.


@triangle have you ever seen Divac play?

[Joyner82reload]

The Kings were a great passing team because they had elite passers at virtually every position. The only player on the team that wasn't an above average passer was Scott Pollard.

The Spurs on the other hand are great as a team, not individuals. Aside from Ginobili and Duncan that is.

[stalkerforlife]

The team that won the title.

[L.Kizzle]

Kings.

Spurs more comparable to the early 70s Knicks.

[wakencdukest]

The Kings had better passers, but the Spurs in the finals last year had some of the best ball movement I've ever seen.