Building 7

[Lensanity]

Yet gullible ****s think the government wasn't trying to hide anything

How does a massive building such as that collapsing not even get a mention in a commissions report?

JET FUEL CAN'T MELT STEEL BEAMS

[Akrazotile]

OP will you check your friggin PM's???


;)

[TheGreatDeraj]

Government is 100% without a doubt hiding something. It is factual, not speculation.

Missing 28 pages of 9/11 Commission Report

[Lensanity]

Government is 100% without a doubt hiding something. It is factual, not speculation.

Missing 28 pages of 9/11 Commission Report

Yet despite these facts anybody that says it was an inside job is called a tin foil hat wearing nutcase by the people that only know what they know about 9/11 from what they have seen from the mainstream media.

[fiddy]

WW3 started on 9/11. RIP Europe.

[BigBoss]

[Norcaliblunt]

Stay shilling for the rogue network by constantly bringing up Building 7 and staged demolitions instead of the insider trading and the military drills. Just keep debating about a theory that is the most divisive and unprovable. ****ing shill.

[HitandRun Reggie]

So have conspiracy theorists given up on Flight 77 hitting the pentagon, really being some kind of missile? That used to be the biggest and juiciest 911 conspiracy, then they switched to WTC7 for some reason.

[Lensanity]

So have conspiracy theorists given up on Flight 77 hitting the pentagon, really being some kind of missile? That used to be the biggest and juiciest 911 conspiracy, then they switched to WTC7 for some reason.

There's so much more evidence supporting the WTC 7 conspiracy. Many with engineering and physics degrees are sceptical and the collapse of the building can be studied somewhat. Also, there is enough video of WTC 7 collapsing to actually make something of it while there is only a choppy dog shit video released by the Government of the Pentagon. The rise of YouTube may have something to do with people talking about WTC 7 more often and the Pentagon less.

[daily]

So have conspiracy theorists given up on Flight 77 hitting the pentagon, really being some kind of missile? That used to be the biggest and juiciest 911 conspiracy, then they switched to WTC7 for some reason.

The reynolds wrap crowd is a moving target. Once they get shot down enough on one topic they circle around to another one they haven't discussed for a while then move on to the next when they've been exposed on that one.

It's like a revolving door for gullible sheep and the perpetrators just keep stringing them along by tweaking the conspiracy every few months

[dude77]

So have conspiracy theorists given up on Flight 77 hitting the pentagon, really being some kind of missile? That used to be the biggest and juiciest 911 conspiracy, then they switched to WTC7 for some reason.

lol no one gave up on that .. it's just so much bullshit you can't really focus on one thing .. the jumbo jet bullseyeing that small space close to the ground on the pentagon by some idiot who can't even fly a cessna is just one of many bs stories .. there are multiple red flags about '911' .. that's why you have people questioning it .. if it was one thing ok .. but way too many coincidences and weird shit going on

[HitandRun Reggie]

Government is 100% without a doubt hiding something. It is factual, not speculation.

Missing 28 pages of 9/11 Commission Report

[KevinNYC]

Government is 100% without a doubt hiding something. It is factual, not speculation.

Missing 28 pages of 9/11 Commission Report

This 28 pages won't satisfy the inside job/controlled demolition folks because the 28 pages are about other possible foreign help for the 19 hijackers. That is to say the 28 pages believe the 19 hijackers were responsible for 9/11.

[KevinNYC]

There's so much more evidence supporting the WTC 7 conspiracy. .Also, there is enough video of WTC 7 collapsing to actually make something of it while there is only a choppy dog shit video released by the Government of the Pentagon.

What do you mean by evidence? There is currently zero evidence that a controlled demolition took down WTC 1, 2 or 7. Also what the tons of video evidence of WTC 1 and 2. News cameras from all over the world were focused on those buildings, why would you need 7 if controlled demolitions also occurred in 1 and 2?

Many with engineering and physics degrees are sceptical and the collapse of the building can be studied somewhat.

Many? Out of how many people with engineering and physics degrees? A lot ? A little?

Or being an engineer or having physics degree is not really enough. You need to be the right kind of engineer, a structural engineer and even among those, very few structural engineers have experience in building large buildings. So first of all, you're making an appeal to authority argument which is a fallacy, secondly, they still ain't got enough authority.

But none of that matters anyway, the data on how these buildings were constructed is out there. If someone wanted to write a paper on how these buildings could not have come down they way they did, they have all the data they need. They could do real science and submit their findings for peer review and see if their claims survive scrutiny by qualified experts.

The Journal of Structural Engineers did peer review and validate the NIST methodologies on WTC 7 three years ago. So anyone who wants to can do so too.

[TheGreatDeraj]

This 28 pages won't satisfy the inside job/controlled demolition folks because the 28 pages are about other possible foreign help for the 19 hijackers. That is to say the 28 pages believe the 19 hijackers were responsible for 9/11.

That's not correct. The 28 pages suggest at least one foreign government is also responsible for 9/11 by providing financial help to the hijackers. Of course all of the information about the situation is not available(to us), so we don't know how deep the rabbit hole goes.

“There’s nothing in it about national security,” Walter Jones, a Republican congressman from North Carolina who has read the missing pages, contends. “It’s about the Bush Administration and its relationship with the Saudis.” Stephen Lynch, a Massachusetts Democrat, told me that the document is “stunning in its clarity,” and that it offers direct evidence of complicity on the part of certain Saudi individuals and entities in Al Qaeda’s attack on America. “Those twenty-eight pages tell a story that has been completely removed from the 9/11 Report,” Lynch maintains.

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-...ty-eight-pages

we do know:

-missing 28 pages link 9/11 to Saudi Arabia
-Saudi Arabia is an US ally in Middle East
-Osama Bin Laden is a part of a wealthy family connected to the Saudi Royal Family
-Osama Bin Laden's connection to the CIA
-Osama Bin Laden's connection the Bush family
-9/11 was used to pass tyrannical new laws, start several wars in the Middle East escalating violence and killing over 1 million people, and to make trillions of Dollars from the oil, defense contracting, nation building, weaponry, banking etc for the top 1%.

Which leads us to ask:

Did the United States government get double crossed by Saudi Arabia and other governments then cover it up while continuing business with the betrayers?

-or-

Did the United States have some knowledge or participation in the attack and use it to promote their own laws, wars and profit?