Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 43 of 43
  1. #31
    3/8 is real Straight_Ballin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,224

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by nba_55
    no excuses
    Exactly. Irving and Love down..no excuse.

    2/6 is 2/6

  2. #32
    Kevin Love nba_55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,363

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Straight_Ballin
    Exactly. Irving and Love down..no excuse.

    2/6 is 2/6
    rent free

  3. #33
    Paid shill Jameerthefear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Swimming in cash
    Posts
    37,664

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Jordan is a ****ing joke

  4. #34
    454 Dumper Bless Mathews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the underground
    Posts
    6,659

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by nba_55
    1-9 without Pippen. 0/0 <<< 2/6
    You really think Jordan woulda went 2-4 with wade and bosh?????


    You Bron Stans are straight retOarded.

  5. #35
    Kevin Love nba_55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,363

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bless Mathews
    You really think Jordan woulda went 2-4 with wade and bosh?????


    You Bron Stans are straight retOarded.
    He would go 0-0 with Bosh and Wade.

  6. #36
    GOAT sportjames23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    13,956

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    MJ, you got Bron stans shook as [COLOR="Black"]f[/COLOR]uck and you've been retired since before they started watching basketball. How do you do it, bruh?


  7. #37
    High School Varsity 6th Man
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    747

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bless Mathews
    You really think Jordan woulda went 2-4 with wade and bosh?????


    You Bron Stans are straight retOarded.
    Lebron went 2-2 with them; do you got the stupids bruh?
    He went 0-2 on these scrub cavs teams(this year though its b/c of his injuries).
    Lebron is really 2-2 in the finals when he has had a chance to win; he was the fave from 2011-2013, underdog or no chance the other years(such as 2007 and this year tbh). So lebron should have 3 rings but that is the only real flaw on his resume

  8. #38
    3/8 is real Straight_Ballin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    5,224

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by nzahir
    Lebron went 2-2 with them; do you got the stupids bruh?
    He went 0-2 on these scrub cavs teams(this year though its b/c of his injuries).
    Lebron is really 2-2 in the finals when he has had a chance to win; he was the fave from 2011-2013, underdog or no chance the other years(such as 2007 and this year tbh). So lebron should have 3 rings but that is the only real flaw on his resume
    "Only flaw"... I love it.

    The minute he got shit on by Jason Terry was when the world said "yep, Jordan is GOAT"

    Then they turned off the TV and went to bed.

    When Jordan left the NBA, half the viewers stopped watching.
    When Bron leaves, there won't be any loss.

  9. #39
    High School Varsity 6th Man
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    747

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Straight_Ballin
    "Only flaw"... I love it.

    The minute he got shit on by Jason Terry was when the world said "yep, Jordan is GOAT"

    Then they turned off the TV and went to bed.

    When Jordan left the NBA, half the viewers stopped watching.
    When Bron leaves, there won't be any loss.
    That is his only flaw; name me another one? There werent as many stars after jordan retired because he was leaving with all of the 80s and 90s. Also there was a lockout in 1999 buddy.

  10. #40
    454 Dumper Bless Mathews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    the underground
    Posts
    6,659

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by nzahir
    Lebron went 2-2 with them; do you got the stupids bruh?
    He went 0-2 on these scrub cavs teams(this year though its b/c of his injuries).
    Lebron is really 2-2 in the finals when he has had a chance to win; he was the fave from 2011-2013, underdog or no chance the other years(such as 2007 and this year tbh). So lebron should have 3 rings but that is the only real flaw on his resume
    This a bball form.

    2 for 4 shit for brains.

    You know the fucc I'm typin bout

    Bron is a bitch that jumps from a team with superstOars to another team with superstOars.

    He's a bitch.

    Deal with it.

    Mj is so much better than him it's not even close.


    Bron Bron woulda jumped overseas if he had to play in the 80's-90's.

  11. #41
    High School Varsity 6th Man
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    747

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Bless Mathews
    This a bball form.

    2 for 4 shit for brains.

    You know the fucc I'm typin bout

    Bron is a bitch that jumps from a team with superstOars to another team with superstOars.

    He's a bitch.

    Deal with it.

    Mj is so much better than him it's not even close.


    Bron Bron woulda jumped overseas if he had to play in the 80's-90's.
    Speak english next time

  12. #42
    NBA rookie of the year
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,434

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    I know Bran stans cling to this because it's all they have against Jordan, but lets be real:

    1.) No gives a rats f*ck about how players start their career. Some players are great from day 1 (see Magic Johnson winning the Finals MVP as a rookie) some take a little longer to develop. Jordan wasn't even drafted in the top 2 of his draft class. He *developed* into the greatest NBA player over time precisely because he learned and adapted from his losses.

    Shaq got swept out of the playoffs several times in his first few years but nobody remembers that, they just remember Diesel going up to slam it down against the Blazers in game 7 and then threepeat in LA. It's how you peak that matters, not how you start your career (particularly what you achieve in your earliest seasons).

    2.) Those Bulls teams were terrible, even compared to the current Cavs who still probably are a better overall team. Beyond that, outside of his rookie season, all those losses in the playoffs came at the hands of the Bird Celtics ... one of the 3 or 4 greatest teams ever.

    In '87 the Bulls were already starting to close the gap, the Celtics won, but each game was competitive and under a 10 point spread.

    3.) Pippen averaged 10.6 ppg in the Bulls first playoff victory of the Jordan-era, against the Cavs where Jordan averaged 45 ppg and hit the game winning shot to win the series. If Scottie Pippen was the difference there, then LeBron should have no problem in this series since he's getting similar help of a couple of guys giving him 10 ppg or thereabouts for the series. You can't have that argument both ways.


    Just accept LeBron is different, you guys do this to yourself by getting into these stupid arguments.

    He's a a very good player who will likely end up as one of the greats, appreciate him for what he is, rather than having a stick up your ass over what he's not.

    Jordan is a practically impossible standard to live up to. No one expects Sidney Crosby to literally match Wayne Gretzky. It's only in basketball where you have idiots who feel they need to ram their head into a brick wall over and over again.
    Last edited by Soundwave; 06-15-2015 at 05:40 AM.

  13. #43
    College star Collie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,918

    Default Re: Jordan is 1 for 9....

    Quote Originally Posted by Soundwave
    I know Bran stans cling to this because it's all they have against Jordan, but lets be real:

    1.) No gives a rats f*ck about how players start their career. Some players are great from day 1 (see Magic Johnson winning the Finals MVP as a rookie) some take a little longer to develop. Jordan wasn't even drafted in the top 2 of his draft class. He *developed* into the greatest NBA player over time precisely because he learned and adapted from his losses.

    Shaq got swept out of the playoffs several times in his first few years but nobody remembers that, they just remember Diesel going up to slam it down against the Blazers in game 7 and then threepeat in LA. It's how you peak that matters, not how you start your career (particularly what you achieve in your earliest seasons).

    2.) Those Bulls teams were terrible, even compared to the current Cavs who still probably are a better overall team. Beyond that, outside of his rookie season, all those losses in the playoffs came at the hands of the Bird Celtics ... one of the 3 or 4 greatest teams ever.

    In '87 the Bulls were already starting to close the gap, the Celtics won, but each game was competitive and under a 10 point spread.

    3.) Pippen averaged 10.6 ppg in the Bulls first playoff victory of the Jordan-era, against the Cavs where Jordan averaged 45 ppg and hit the game winning shot to win the series. If Scottie Pippen was the difference there, then LeBron should have no problem in this series since he's getting similar help of a couple of guys giving him 10 ppg or thereabouts for the series. You can't have that argument both ways.


    Just accept LeBron is different, you guys do this to yourself by getting into these stupid arguments.

    He's a a very good player who will likely end up as one of the greats, appreciate him for what he is, rather than having a stick up your ass over what he's not.

    Jordan is a practically impossible standard to live up to. No one expects Sidney Crosby to literally match Wayne Gretzky. It's only in basketball where you have idiots who feel they need to ram their head into a brick wall over and over again.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •